Less than six minutes into Game 4 of the NBA Finals, the Oklahoma City Thunder trailed by nine an...

Less than six minutes into Game 4 of the NBA Finals, the Oklahoma City Thunder trailed by nine and their vaunted defense had already surrendered 24 points. They'd gone back to their double-big starting lineup with both Chet Holmgren and Isaiah Hartenstein on the floor, and the Indiana Pacers had run circles around them. Things didn't improve much when Holmgren went to the bench. The Pacers were simply playing too quickly, too crisply, too confidently. They couldn't miss from long range. Meanwhile, OKC couldn't buy a three, and a weary Shai Gilgeous-Alexander couldn't get a toehold in the game. Gainbridge Fieldhouse was going berserk.On the road, facing the prospect of going down 3-1, the Thunder were getting as stiff a test of their championship mettle as they were going to get. They were getting a chance to reinforce on the biggest stage what they'd already shown in their nip-and-tuck second-round series against Denver - that they didn't win 68 regular-season games by being mere frontrunners, that their youth and relative inexperience aren't damning, and that on top of being exceptionally talented, they're also resilient as hell.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Led by a determined Jalen Williams, who resolutely power-stepped to the basket for free throws and one-hand-gather scoop layups as part of the most important performance of his young career, the Thunder rode out Indiana's hot shooting and chipped away at the lead. They continued to do so even after Gilgeous-Alexander went to the bench for an unusually early rest at the seven-minute mark - one of a handful of tweaks OKC made in its attempt to find anything that would work against this relentless Pacers team. By the end of the first quarter, the deficit had been whittled down to one.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790467/cropped_GettyImages-2219334738.jpg?ts=1749915620" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790467/w220xh124_GettyImages-2219334738.jpg?ts=1749915620 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790467/w320xh180_GettyImages-2219334738.jpg?ts=1749915620 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790467/w640xh360_GettyImages-2219334738.jpg?ts=1749915620 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790467/w768xh432_GettyImages-2219334738.jpg?ts=1749915620 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790467/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2219334738.jpg?ts=1749915620 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Nathaniel S. Butler / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>What ensued was a heavyweight bout in which the two combatants traded body blow after body blow for three more rounds. The Thunder took the lead in the second quarter and built a six-point cushion midway through the frame, but Indiana dialed up the pressure and regained the advantage before the break after holding OKC to just six points over the final five-and-a-half minutes. The Pacers would not relinquish that lead until late in the fourth quarter. They stretched it to as many as 10 points with under a minute remaining in the third. And it was more than just the scoreboard that made it feel like the home team had complete control of the game at that point in time. The Thunder looked frazzled, overwhelmed, and tired. They kept cycling through different lineup combinations and defensive looks - searching, searching, and searching while their opponents seemed to know exactly what they wanted to do. Indiana's pace and full-court pickups seemed to be getting to them.It felt like the Thunder were chasing their own tails. Their offense was completely stagnant. (They threw a playoff-low 203 passes in the game and finished with a season-low 11 assists on 37 made field goals). Pascal Siakam blew up almost everything they ran on his side of the floor. They had to move Gilgeous-Alexander off the ball to alleviate the 94-foot pressure he was facing from Andrew Nembhard (Williams spent more time on-ball than him for the first time this postseason), and they suffered from shaky handling when anyone but SGA tried to initiate. Gilgeous-Alexander was also targeted at the other end, in ball-screen action and with off-ball cuts or crashes, and had his worst defensive game of the playoffs.The Thunder struggled to keep the ball in front of them, and when they helped off the strong side (as they're wont to do), Indiana burned them with corner threes. At the other end, they couldn't generate catch-and-shoot threes of their own and continued to clank the rare outside looks they got. (They finished 3-for-17 from downtown). When Williams committed an eight-second violation immediately after Obi Toppin crushed a dunk off a baseline cut, they looked outright defeated.Improbably, they weren't. Williams' driving and shot-making kept the game from getting out of hand in the first half, but it was the doggedness of Alex Caruso that kept OKC within spitting distance in the second. He was absolutely everywhere, plugging gaps and blowing up actions on defense, fearlessly barreling to the cup and nailing jumpers on offense, skying for rebounds in traffic on both ends. As the one Thunder player with championship experience, he was their least rattled player throughout the game, and his sturdiness prevented a rocking boat from capsizing. He finished with 20 points on 7-for-9 shooting with five steals and a block. Holmgren was also instrumental at both ends down the stretch. He had six points and four offensive rebounds (which was four more than the Pacers had as a team) in the fourth quarter, and he helped completely kill Indiana's offensive flow when he started switching onto Tyrese Haliburton rather than dropping back against him in pick-and-roll. It's a tactic Mark Daigneault probably should've uncorked earlier in the game, but when he finally did, Holmgen demonstrated his immense defensive value by hanging with the Pacers' wriggly point guard on multiple possessions. (Haliburton also played into the Thunder's hands by repeatedly trying to attack that switch instead of zipping the ball elsewhere after pulling their best rim-protector away from the basket).All of that set the stage for Gilgeous-Alexander's heroic closing kick, which saw him score 15 points in the final four-odd minutes to seal a 111-104 victory and level the series. Turns out all the tactics OKC used in order to preserve the MVP for later in the game - from the early rest to the scaled-down creation load - paid off handsomely in crunch time. That run was facilitated by another tactical wrinkle from the Thunder: <figure class="article-segment--embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
With 3 min 52 sec remaining, Mark Daigneault called timeout and made the adjustment that won the Thunder Game 4. Nembhard had been guarding SGA extremely well. Thunder used the same action 3x to get Nesmith to switch, Shai kept scoring/getting the foul call. <a href="https://t.co/6g4GnhA0RU">pic.twitter.com/6g4GnhA0RU</a>— Steph Noh (@StephNoh) <a href="https://twitter.com/StephNoh/status/1933735227999810014?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 14, 2025</a>
</blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></figure>It was also aided by some overexuberance from Indiana's defense, including a couple of reckless before-the-inbounds fouls by Game 3 hero Bennedict Mathurin. The Pacers generally closed the game poorly after playing three fantastic quarters. They missed all eight of their 3-point attempts in the fourth and basically forgot Siakam existed down the stretch.There will surely also be a ton of carping about the officiating and Scott Foster-related conspiracy theorizing from the Indiana faithful. But however you slice it, this was an incredible show of mental and physical fortitude from OKC, which became the first team in 15 years to win a Finals game with fewer than four made 3-pointers. It was the type of larceny that even these unkillable Pacers should be able to recognize and respect. It wasn't as dramatic at the end, but this win felt every bit as improbable as Indiana's Game 1 robbery. It was ugly, it was gritty, and it proved that the Thunder can withstand punches as strong as the ones they dole out.It's also a huge credit to the Pacers that a 68-win team had to pull out such a gritty win (and yes, get a fairly favorable whistle) to avoid being pushed to the brink. Each team has now stolen a game it had no business winning in this series. Through four games, there hasn't been much to separate them. We could try to guess what will happen next, but in one of the most fun and unpredictable Finals in years, that would feel like a fool's errand.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31549488/related

The Thunder show they've also got some of that alligator blood

Even though their remarkable Game 1 comeback win followed what's become a familiar playoff bluepr...

Even though their <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3296788" href="https://thescore.com/news/3296788">remarkable Game 1 comeback win</a> followed what's become a familiar playoff blueprint for them, the Indiana Pacers didn't really look like the Indiana Pacers in that contest against the Oklahoma City Thunder.Their typically judicious offense turned the ball over an unthinkable 25 times. They couldn't get their deadly transition game in gear and were instead forced to grind out points in the halfcourt. Outside of a red-hot Obi Toppin, their deep and reliable bench got outplayed by OKC's. And until his stunning 18-foot game-winner, Tyrese Haliburton struggled to maneuver around or through the Thunder's menacing defense. There's a reason Haliburton said that the game, despite going Indiana's way, <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3296727" href="https://thescore.com/news/3296727">wasn't a recipe to win</a> the series.Game 2 brought more of the same. The Pacers were even more bogged down in the half court, their bench was outplayed even more thoroughly, and Haliburton's movement was even more constricted. The Thunder's comfortable win swung the feel and discourse surrounding the series back to the monumental uphill climb Indiana was facing.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Then Game 3 rolled around, and at last the Pacers played the distinct brand of basketball we'd come to recognize throughout the second half of this season and this entire playoff run. We saw their pace and flow, we saw them create space on offense and take it away on defense, and we saw their depth shine through. We also finally saw Haliburton in all his Haliburtonness, zipping hit-ahead passes to kickstart semi-transition plays, using screen rejects to breach the paint, and aggressively hunting his own shot against drop coverage. If there is indeed a recipe for Indiana to upset OKC and win the title, this game followed it almost to a T.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790115/cropped_GettyImages-2219094203.jpg?ts=1749747093" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790115/w220xh124_GettyImages-2219094203.jpg?ts=1749747093 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790115/w320xh180_GettyImages-2219094203.jpg?ts=1749747093 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790115/w640xh360_GettyImages-2219094203.jpg?ts=1749747093 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790115/w768xh432_GettyImages-2219094203.jpg?ts=1749747093 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790115/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2219094203.jpg?ts=1749747093 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Nathaniel S. Butler / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>That doesn't mean replicating Game 3 is certain to produce similar results. The Thunder will be desperate in Game 4 and beyond; they're going to punch back. The Pacers still have a lot they need to improve upon - like pick-and-roll defense, for example - if they're to win two more games and hoist the Larry O'Brien Trophy. But it's a very encouraging sign that they pulled out a 116-107 victory despite hitting just nine 3-pointers, shooting eight fewer free throws and grabbing two fewer offensive rebounds than OKC did, and getting three catastrophic quarters from an ailing Myles Turner.They won by protecting the basketball and winning the turnover battle for the first time in the series. They did it by outscoring the Thunder in the paint after being outscored on the interior by 20 points across the first two games. They did it by holding Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in check with relentless full-court pressure. More than anything, they did it by turning defense into offense. That's a cornerstone of Indiana's identity that was glaringly absent from Games 1 and 2.After getting out in transition on just 10.9% of their possessions in those first two games, the Pacers did so 17.2% of the time in Game 3, per <a href="https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/game_detail?game=248424826">Cleaning the Glass</a>. Most notably, they scored 1.63 points per possession when running off live defensive rebounds (which they did 28% of the time) after previously averaging 0.81 points on those possessions.Whether it was Pascal Siakam leaking out, Toppin zooming behind the entire Thunder defense with pure hustle, or Haliburton pushing the tempo himself off his team-high eight defensive rebounds, the Pacers consistently sowed the kind of chaos and confusion in which they thrive.But while they spent much more of Game 3 playing in the open floor, their offense was actually more deliberate in the halfcourt than earlier in the series, per <a href="https://stats.inpredictable.com/nba/ssnTeamShot.php?season=2024&amp;po=1&amp;frdt=2025-06-11&amp;todt=2025-06-11&amp;view=off">Inpredictable</a>. After routinely hoisting on their first half-decent look in Game 2 as a means of avoiding the turnovers that plagued them in Game 1, the Pacers were a bit more patient in Game 3 - a bit more willing to let actions progress and let good looks snowball into better ones. That patience, coupled with their early-offense opportunism, was a big part of the reason the Pacers were able to nearly double their rim frequency, from 16% in Game 2 to 31% in Game 3.Another big reason: T.J. McConnell, who completely changed the tenor of the game when he checked in late in the first quarter. He provided that sorely needed dose of rim pressure with his shot-from-a-cannon drives, which he finished either with layups, kickouts, or passes to cutters. He applied his trademark defensive pressure, coming up with five steals in 15 minutes, including three off inbounds passes in the backcourt. His first shift quickly turned an eight-point deficit into a Pacers lead, and they never trailed by more than two possessions the rest of the way.He was joined on Indiana's bench brigade by a scalding-hot Bennedict Mathurin, who managed to harness his frenetic energy and channel it into a flurry of smooth mid-range pull-ups and power drives that even the ultra-physical Thunder couldn't contain. He finished with 27 points on 9-for-12 shooting, tying Manu Ginobili and Jason Terry for the third-highest bench scoring total in Finals history. His self-creation and shot-making helped buy Haliburton five minutes of rest to start the fourth quarter, during which the Pacers erased a five-point deficit. He was so unstoppable that OKC eventually had to put Alex Caruso on him - the ultimate sign of respect. The Pacers also got huge bench contributions from Toppin and Ben Sheppard. On top of gashing the Thunder in transition, Toppin rotated well on defense, came through with two massive plays in crunch time (a putback dunk and a block on a Jalen Williams drive), and finished as a game-high plus-18. Sheppard's sticky point-of-attack defense on Gilgeous-Alexander was critical, especially with Andrew Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith battling foul trouble.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790117/cropped_GettyImages-2219086710.jpg?ts=1749747332" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790117/w220xh124_GettyImages-2219086710.jpg?ts=1749747332 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790117/w320xh180_GettyImages-2219086710.jpg?ts=1749747332 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790117/w640xh360_GettyImages-2219086710.jpg?ts=1749747332 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790117/w768xh432_GettyImages-2219086710.jpg?ts=1749747332 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/790117/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2219086710.jpg?ts=1749747332 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> A.J. Mast / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The Pacers' defense as a whole was outstanding after the first quarter, especially in holding the Thunder to just 18 points in the fourth. It started with Nembhard, who had one of the most impactful defensive performances anyone's had against Gilgeous-Alexander this season. He face-guarded the MVP for 94 feet, dodged screens to stay attached to his hip, and refused to bite on any of his fakes. He was so effective at denying Gilgeous-Alexander the ball that the Thunder had to reroute a big chunk of their offense to Williams, whose <a href="https://www.nba.com/stats/players/touches?DateTo=&amp;LastNGames=1&amp;PORound=4&amp;dir=D&amp;sort=TIME_OF_POSS">time of possession</a> jumped from an average of 3.9 minutes across the first two games of the series to 5.5 in Game 3, while Gilgeous-Alexander's dropped from 8.6 minutes to 6.5.Williams largely rose to that challenge, but he was occasionally loose with the ball and demonstrated some questionable judgment. He and Gilgeous-Alexander combined for 10 turnovers and just seven assists. The Thunder as a team coughed it up 19 times, their most in any game this postseason and their second-highest total of the whole campaign. That's a credit to a defense that's steadily improved from leaky to solid to borderline elite over the season.Haliburton's improvement on that end has been a central component, and that was on display again in this game as he jumped passing lanes, got his hands in driving gaps, and prevented Gilgeous-Alexander from turning the corner or splitting hedges when defending pick-and-rolls. Siakam was also everywhere on the back line when he wasn't gamely hanging with OKC's guards on switches. And after being possibly the worst player on the floor for either team up to that point, Turner was an essential ingredient in that decisive fourth quarter, stepping up his ball-screen coverage, locking down the paint, and physically overwhelming Chet Holmgren.Again, there's still a long way to go, and the Thunder will have a whole lot to say about where this series goes from here. But the Pacers have already answered every question about whether they belong on this stage and whether they can hang with the 68-win juggernaut from the West. They may not look quite like the champions we're accustomed to, but this is indisputably a championship-caliber team playing championship-level basketball.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31534663/related

How the Pacers recaptured their identity to pull ahead in the Finals

The Indiana Pacers did it again.   Their latest death-defying act in a postseason full of great e...

The Indiana Pacers did it again. Their latest death-defying act in a postseason full of great escapes saw them steal Game 1 of the Finals from the 68-win Oklahoma City Thunder despite turning the ball over 24 times, getting 17 fewer shooting possessions, trailing for nearly 47 minutes, and facing a fourth-quarter deficit as large as 15 points.The comeback was punctuated, once again, by a Tyrese Haliburton dagger that gave Indiana its first lead of the game with 0.3 seconds on the clock. That shot came immediately after Shai Gilgeous-Alexander missed a 12-foot pull-up at the other end that he can make in his sleep.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Even after watching them do this over and over, it really didn't feel like the Pacers were going to be able to pull that one off - not against a team as good and defensively dialed in as OKC. It didn't even really feel like the Thunder let go of the rope in the last few minutes. They had one or two static offensive possessions, missed a couple of great looks, gave a couple of bad fouls, surrendered a key offensive rebound, and that was all it took for victory to be wrenched from their grasp by the <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3289691" href="https://thescore.com/news/3289691">greatest playoff comeback team</a> we've ever seen.At the other end, Obi Toppin couldn't miss. Myles Turner banked in a side-step three from the wing. Aaron Nesmith hit one off an improvised pitch play in the corner, with his body turned sideways and two defenders in his grill. Andrew Nembhard hit a filthy stepback over Gilgeous-Alexander. Pascal Siakam crashed from the corner for a putback. And Indiana sustained its defensive pressure, setting the stage for Haliburton's heroics. <figure class="article-segment--embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
lol The yellow team won. (There was a yellow team) <a href="https://t.co/kNDmVYOFWe">pic.twitter.com/kNDmVYOFWe</a>— Wes Goldberg (@wcgoldberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/wcgoldberg/status/1930826116035461500?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 6, 2025</a>
</blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></figure>How does this keep happening? How does the team that led by double digits in the fourth quarter wind up feeling like the one that had no margin for error? A dash of luck has been involved, sure, but all spring long, whenever they've had their backs against the wall, the Pacers have found a way to capitalize on every mistake while making almost none themselves. I could tell you how improbable this all continues to be, how we haven't seen a heist like that <a href="https://x.com/keerthikau/status/1930836438565917061">in any Finals game in the play-by-play era</a>, or how Haliburton is having <a href="https://x.com/inpredict/status/1930834724722983035">by far the most clutch postseason</a> in NBA history. But odds are you know all that already. So, let's try to identify some of the factors that have enabled the Pacers to make out like bandits time and again. The most important ingredient is their 3-point shooting proficiency. They've hit another level in the playoffs, jumping from 37% in the regular season to a league-best 42% from deep. They're one of the rare teams that can create legitimate five-out spacing on offense while still being defensively viable at every stage of the playoffs. Needless to say, none of their comebacks happen without 3-point barrages from a variety of sources, be it Haliburton, Nesmith, Nembhard, Turner, or Toppin.That always figured to be <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3295887" href="https://thescore.com/news/3295887">one of the key battlegrounds</a> in the series, considering OKC's penchant for giving up threes - particularly from the corners - as a consequence of packing the paint and helping aggressively in the middle. The Pacers shot 10-of-16 on corner threes in Game 1. They went 5-for-8 from long range in the final nine minutes while erasing their 15-point deficit, and one of their three misses resulted in Siakam's putback that sliced the lead to one in the final minute.That offensive rebound wasn't entirely coincidental, either. The Pacers' floor-spreading capabilities prompted the Thunder, who've started two big men together throughout the playoffs, to move center Isaiah Hartenstein to the bench and ultimately close the game with neither Hartenstein nor a struggling Chet Holmgren. That contributed to Indiana - the league's third-worst rebounding team - grabbing 13 offensive boards.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/789202/cropped_GettyImages-2218124360.jpg?ts=1749227974" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/789202/w220xh124_GettyImages-2218124360.jpg?ts=1749227974 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/789202/w320xh180_GettyImages-2218124360.jpg?ts=1749227974 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/789202/w640xh360_GettyImages-2218124360.jpg?ts=1749227974 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/789202/w768xh432_GettyImages-2218124360.jpg?ts=1749227974 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/789202/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2218124360.jpg?ts=1749227974 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Adam Pantozzi / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The egalitarian nature of the Pacers' offense has also benefited them in crunch time because opposing defenses don't always know where to focus their attention. It allows them to sow confusion and run decoy actions that successfully occupy potential help defenders. Unlike a lot of offenses this time of year, any play could realistically be run for anyone and nobody will hold the ball for very long.In Game 1, for example, Haliburton's <a href="https://www.nba.com/stats/players/touches?PORound=4&amp;dir=D&amp;sort=AVG_SEC_PER_TOUCH">average touch time</a> was less than half of Gilgeous-Alexander's. Siakam was the Pacers' leading scorer with 19 points, making them the first team in 12 years to win a Finals game without a 20-point scorer.They have a lot of guys who can create off the bounce and are entrusted with initiating duties, which also played a big part in Game 1. For long stretches, they played through Siakam and relied on him to attack size mismatches. In the fourth quarter, with Haliburton struggling while being pressured on the ball and face-guarded away from it, Indiana gave the keys to Nembhard. The rugged third-year guard was incredibly strong with the ball, withstanding all manner of physicality and pressure to chisel his way into the paint in a way the more willowy Haliburton might not have been able to.Conditioning also has to be mentioned here. The Pacers play a breakneck style that wears out opponents, which is why they're seemingly always able to execute with more precision in crunch time. Rick Carlisle runs a long rotation - he went 10 deep in Game 1 and played Haliburton and Siakam just 38 and 34 minutes, respectively - which allows the team to sustain its pace and extended ball pressure until the final buzzer.There are other qualities of this team that are more ineffable and harder to quantify. The Pacers don't panic. When things aren't going their way, they'll rarely, if ever, abandon their principles or their identity. Poise and perseverance are how they limited their second-half turnovers to just five in Game 1 after coughing it up 19 times in the first half, all while continuing to run their quick-hitting offense. Sheer effort and stamina are how they held the rip-and-run Thunder to just seven points off 14 live-ball turnovers.No matter what happens, they keep playing fast, they keep cutting, they keep moving the ball, they keep sprinting into ghost screens, they keep communicating on defense, they keep trusting one another. And with the game on the line, they know they can trust their superstar point guard, who's now <a href="https://x.com/keerthikau/status/1930824759098343532">6-for-7</a> on shots to tie or take the lead in the final 90 seconds of regulation or overtime this postseason. Here's the thing, though: Apart from Haliburton's ludicrous late-game shot-making, Indiana isn't the first or even the most talented team to contain all those different qualities. The Pacers are absolutely worth celebrating, marveling at, and possibly even trying to emulate, but you could replay this postseason <a href="https://x.com/TylerSmith_ISL/status/1930832359214964805">literally a million times</a> and not witness a spate of comeback wins like the one they've strung together over the last five weeks.They're a great team, without a doubt, but certain aspects of their magical run simply defy explanation, and there's no sense trying to find logic in the inexplicable. What we can do is enjoy the hell out of this ride for as long as it lasts. We'll probably never experience anything like it again.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31485352/related

How do the Pacers keep doing this?

The NBA campaign has finally reached its endgame, with the Finals set to tip off Thursday night. ...

The NBA campaign has finally reached its endgame, with the Finals set to tip off Thursday night. In one corner, we have an <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3272746" href="https://thescore.com/news/3272746">abnormally young</a>, <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3293223" href="https://thescore.com/news/3293223">defensively impenetrable</a> Oklahoma City Thunder team that's been historically dominant all season and boasts the league MVP. In the other corner, we have a swift, surging Indiana Pacers squad that's been on <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3289691" href="https://thescore.com/news/3289691">a magical run</a> this postseason, powered by one of the most gifted and creative point guards in the game.Here are the key three tactical battlegrounds that will help determine who wins the series. <h3>Turnover control vs. transition runouts </h3>This matchup pits two of the NBA's most judicious offenses against two of its most aggressive ball-pressuring defenses. <div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>The Thunder combined those two elements to a historic degree during the regular season, ranking first in offensive and defensive turnover rate, racking up more steals than any team in the 21st century, and posting the best turnover differential (plus-5.3 per game) of all time. That differential has gotten even more dramatic (6.2) in these playoffs.The Pacers aren't at the same level, but they're no slouches, having turned the ball over at the league's third-lowest rate while turning opponents over at the 12th-highest rate during the season. Their rates have held steady during the playoffs.For both teams, ball protection is largely a byproduct of their <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3293747" href="https://thescore.com/news/3293747">brilliant point guards</a>, Tyrese Haliburton and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Haliburton and the Pacers manage to limit turnovers despite throwing more passes than any team in the league besides Golden State, while Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder do so while playing a lower-risk, more iso-heavy brand of offense. (They pass about 60 fewer times per game than Indiana.)The teams' defenses also apply pressure in different ways; the Pacers pick up ball-handlers in the backcourt more often than any other team, while the Thunder swarm drives, passes, and post-ups in the half court (not that they're at all averse to full-court pressure).A lot hinges on which of those entities wins out in this series, because OKC and Indiana are exceptionally good at turning takeaways into points. They rank first and third in points added via transition play this postseason, per <a href="https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/league/context?season=2024&amp;seasontype=playoffs&amp;start=10/1/2024&amp;end=10/15/2025#tab-offense_transition">Cleaning the Glass.</a> As the clear underdogs in this series, going up against one of the most ferocious defenses we've ever seen, it's going to be particularly important for the Pacers to take care of the basketball - to be crisp with their actions, precise with their passes, and tight with their handles.Haliburton can be relied upon to do that, and Pascal Siakam (who's turned the ball over just 1.1 times per game in the playoffs) probably can be as well. But one of the main features of OKC's defense is its ability to funnel the ball from sure-handed stars to mistake-prone role players. Which means guys such as Andrew Nembhard, Myles Turner, Aaron Nesmith, T.J. McConnell, and Bennedict Mathurin have to be fully prepared to face a level of pressure they haven't yet seen.If the Pacers can withstand that pressure and avoid the costly giveaways that have torpedoed every other Thunder opponent so far, they might have a glimmer of hope.<h3>Pacers vs. Thunder's half-court defense</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788905/cropped_GettyImages-2190877308.jpg?ts=1749068025" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788905/w220xh124_GettyImages-2190877308.jpg?ts=1749068025 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788905/w320xh180_GettyImages-2190877308.jpg?ts=1749068025 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788905/w640xh360_GettyImages-2190877308.jpg?ts=1749068025 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788905/w768xh432_GettyImages-2190877308.jpg?ts=1749068025 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788905/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2190877308.jpg?ts=1749068025 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Ron Hoskins / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>If they can't pry the ball away from Gilgeous-Alexander and Co. to kickstart their deadly transition attack, the Pacers will have to try to score against the Thunder's set defense. In those contained scenarios, it's going to be a best-on-best battle: Indiana's top-ranked half-court offense (which has produced 105.8 points per 100 possessions in the playoffs) against OKC's top-ranked half-court defense (which has allowed just 88.6 points per 100). Rarely has such an unstoppable force met such an immovable object.All the spacious lanes Haliburton's enjoyed dancing through to this point, the passing angles he's created and exploited, the mismatches he's hunted, the different ways he's managed to put opposing defenses in rotation ... all of that is about to dissipate. He's going to have to deal with the likes of Lu Dort, Alex Caruso, and Cason Wallace hounding his every move, face-guarding him, chasing him around screens, swiping at his dribble, bumping him off his line, and jamming him up when he tries to get free off pindowns. He's going to see a whole buffet of pick-and-roll coverages, including a ton of switches. And OKC's army of help defenders will track him wherever he goes, darting in and out of his path at every turn.As great as Haliburton is, he can lapse into passivity against those kinds of specialized coverages, and that's been an issue for him against the Thunder in the past. His usage rate in the teams' two head-to-head meetings this season was 13.5%, his lowest against any opponent. That mark would rank him 10th among Indiana's rotation players this postseason, right between Jarace Walker and Thomas Bryant. He also averaged only 5.5 assists, and though he satisfied the ball-control requirement (turning it over just once in the two games), that wasn't enough to offset his lack of offensive involvement. Needless to say, he needs to be more assertive in this series, even if it means more mistakes.The rest of the Pacers will also need to be ready to pick up the slack, starting with Siakam. His individual matchups won't be any easier - he'll have to deal with the likes of Chet Holmgren and Jalen Williams with doses of Dort and Caruso sprinkled in - but he'll at least have some size mismatches to hunt (Gilgeous-Alexander being his best bet) and will have opportunities to capitalize when OKC sends aggressive help in Haliburton's direction.Indiana's role players are also going to have to take advantage of that attention by continuing to knock down their threes. This has been by far the best 3-point shooting team in the playoffs (40.1%), and the Thunder defense has allowed the fourth-highest opponent 3-point attempt rate - and second-highest corner 3-point rate - of all postseason teams. That's the consequence of all their paint-packing, stunting, doubling, and pre-rotating in the middle of the floor. They've gotten away with it to this point because their opponents have shot just 33% from deep. If the Pacers can make the Thunder pay, by zipping the ball around faster than they can rotate and by drilling the clean outside looks that materialize as a result, maybe all that traffic in the lane will start to clear up a bit.<h3>Indiana's defense vs. SGA's co-stars </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788907/cropped_GettyImages-2217023517.jpg?ts=1749068236" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788907/w220xh124_GettyImages-2217023517.jpg?ts=1749068236 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788907/w320xh180_GettyImages-2217023517.jpg?ts=1749068236 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788907/w640xh360_GettyImages-2217023517.jpg?ts=1749068236 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788907/w768xh432_GettyImages-2217023517.jpg?ts=1749068236 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788907/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2217023517.jpg?ts=1749068236 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> William Purnell / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>No team has much hope of stopping or even slowing down Gilgeous-Alexander, the craftiest, most versatile, most relentless scorer in the league. If Minnesota's perimeter defenders couldn't make a dent in his armor, Indiana's probably can't either.Nesmith is likely the best man for the job in this series, but he's nursing an ankle sprain that could make it even tougher than it already would've been to stay balanced while trying to mirror Gilgeous-Alexander's frictionless changes of pace and direction. Nembhard will get his share of cracks at that assignment, but he'll be giving up some size in the matchup. Every other Pacer is either too small or too slow to have a chance. All of which is to say, "keep a lid on the MVP" can't really be part of the Pacers' roadmap to victory here. That obviously doesn't mean they're going to throw their hands up and let Gilgeous-Alexander do whatever he wants. They'll do their best to make up for the limitations of their individual defenders with team schemes that force SGA to play in a crowd. They'll work to get the ball out of his hands, vary their coverages to keep him on his toes, and try to scramble his decision-making as much as possible. At the end of the day, though, Indiana's best hope of slowing down an offense that's proven to be vulnerable at points in these playoffs is to limit the rest of the Thunder. Some of that will simply be decided by the whims of jump-shooting variance. Denver pushed OKC to seven games largely because none of the Thunder's role players could hit a three and Jalen Williams couldn't make a mid-range pull-up or a layup for six games. That changed against Minnesota, but it wasn't because the Timberwolves played worse defense than the Nuggets did.At the same time, the Nuggets' heavily used zone defense was a knuckleball that clearly threw OKC out of rhythm, and their decision to guard Holmgren with wings proved effective at tamping down his offensive impact. Whether or not the Pacers pull those specific levers, they'll need to be open-minded and creative in their defensive approach.That might mean doing something they've been loath to do this season and cross-matching Turner onto a low-usage wing (like Dort or Caruso), while letting someone such as Nesmith take the Holmgren assignment. Maybe it'll mean amping up their switching and showing minimal help to try to make Gilgeous-Alexander a one-man show and turn his co-stars into bystanders.No solutions are perfect - every non-zone option leaves the difficult questions of who guards SGA and where Haliburton hides - but the edict should be clear: Get funky, throw a bunch of different pitches, and see if anything can catch the Thunder on the wrong foot.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31473656/related

The 3 battlegrounds that will decide the NBA Finals

After completing one of the most interesting trades in recent NBA history on the eve of training ...

After completing one of the most interesting trades in recent NBA history on the eve of training camp, it's fitting that the New York Knicks and Minnesota Timberwolves saw their seasons end at the same stage of the playoffs. And the fact both teams reached the finals of their respective conferences makes the deal feel like a win-win, at least in the short term.A single season is rarely a referendum on the success or failure of a trade, especially when one of the players involved is an impending free agent and long-term flexibility was a primary motivating factor for one of the teams. But this still feels like a good time to reflect on the deal that sent Karl-Anthony Towns to New York in exchange for Julius Randle and Donte DiVincenzo, with a particular focus on the two power forwards. (And yes, I still consider Towns at least part power forward.)First off, both Towns and Randle had tremendous seasons. Towns was much better for the balance of the regular season, averaging 24.4 points, 12.8 rebounds, and 3.1 assists on 53/42/83 splits (63% true shooting), earning an All-Star berth and being named to the All-NBA third team. His presence as a spacer and pick-and-pop weapon, along with his dogged work as a driver and interior finisher, were massive contributors to the Knicks' top-five offense. They scored seven more points per 100 possessions with him on the floor. Even in his up-and-down series against the Pacers, he was brilliant offensively, punishing size mismatches when he wasn't torching Myles Turner off the bounce. <div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Randle's counting stats were less impressive - 18.7, 7.1, and 4.7 on 59% true shooting - but he adapted significantly after a <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3137179" href="https://thescore.com/news/3137179">rocky start</a> to his Wolves career and played a central role in the team's <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3242001" href="https://thescore.com/news/3242001">second-half surge</a>, during which Minnesota ranked top seven on both sides of the ball. He arguably outperformed Towns across the first two rounds of the playoffs.For two players with fairly distinct styles, Towns and Randle share a lot of similarities. They're both extremely skilled offensive bigs who are capable of strong defensive stretches but too often undercut themselves on that end with inconsistent effort and lapses in focus. They both had shaky playoff track records until recently; Towns conquered many of those demons in Minnesota a year ago and continued to excel as a Knick, while Randle had his long-awaited playoff breakthrough in his first season as a Timberwolf. We also saw both of them succumb to some of their worst habits and impulses at the tail end of their otherwise excellent, narrative-shifting postseason runs. For Towns, that meant a cavalcade of silly fouls along with schematic mistakes and breakdowns in pick-and-roll defense. For Randle, it meant sluggish offensive decision-making that led to ugly turnovers and bled into his effort level at the other end. <figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787125/cropped_GettyImages-2215842754.jpg?ts=1748970956" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787125/w220xh124_GettyImages-2215842754.jpg?ts=1748970956 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787125/w320xh180_GettyImages-2215842754.jpg?ts=1748970956 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787125/w640xh360_GettyImages-2215842754.jpg?ts=1748970956 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787125/w768xh432_GettyImages-2215842754.jpg?ts=1748970956 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787125/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2215842754.jpg?ts=1748970956 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Zach Beeker / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>Those bad habits are why these are two of the most polarizing players in the league, with volatile performance swings that sway people's perception of them from one game to the next. For just one rudimentary example, consider Randle's conference finals series against Oklahoma City: He averaged 25.3 points on 62% shooting in the odd-numbered games, and 5.5 points on 17% shooting - with three times as many turnovers as made field goals - in the even games. If I'm making a value judgment, I still like the deal a bit better from the Knicks' end. It raised their ceiling and gave them a legit shot at making the Finals that I don't think they would've had otherwise. Both teams benefited from significant injuries to their opponents in the second round, with Steph Curry and Jayson Tatum both going down, but New York was already effectively up 3-1 in that series when Tatum got hurt, while Minnesota was scuffling in the first half of an eventual Game 1 loss when Curry hobbled off the court. It's easier for me to believe the Wolves would've gotten to the same stage with Towns than it is to believe the Knicks would've put the healthy Celtics on the ropes with Randle and DiVincenzo in his place. Towns actually held up reasonably well on switches in that Celtics series, even before Tatum's injury. And more importantly, he was able to anchor the back line and protect the rim effectively (holding Boston to 36.8% shooting at the rim), thus giving New York the benefit of frontcourt spacing at the offensive end. Randle wouldn't have been able to do that. Minnesota struggled throughout the season and especially in the playoffs when he played without Rudy Gobert. At the same time, Randle was genuinely great at both ends against the Lakers and Warriors. It's fair to wonder if the Wolves could've made such quick work of those teams if Towns had been the one tasked with containing LeBron James and Luka Doncic in primary matchups and ball-screen coverage in the first round, or if he'd been the one faced with solving Draymond Green's defense in the second. There's also the fact that, outside of that Celtics series, Towns struggled defensively at center. He went from playing just 37% of his minutes at the five in his last season in Minnesota to playing 97% of his minutes there this year, according to <a href="https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/player/3696/positions#tab-team_efficiency">Cleaning the Glass</a>. And his defensive field-goal percentage at the rim was third worst among qualified big men during the regular season. (Randle's was fourth worst.)Once Mitchell Robinson returned in the final month of the season, we started to see Towns playing the four next to him with increasing regularity, and the results suggested that was the right move. The Knicks posted a plus-8.3 net rating in 165 minutes with Towns and Robinson on court together during the playoffs, compared to minus-3.3 with Towns as the lone big, per <a href="https://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612752&amp;Season=2024-25&amp;SeasonType=Playoffs&amp;PlayerIds=1626157,1629011">PBP Stats</a>. It's a conundrum that's dogged Towns for basically his entire career; he can't be quite as effective offensively as a four, but his teams tend to have a hard ceiling defensively with him as a full-time five. The Wolves faced the same dilemma, and eventually decided - correctly, it turned out - that the latter was a more important consideration than the former. Part of the reason <a href="https://www.thescore.com/nba/news/2380422">it made sense</a> for them to trade for Gobert was that the need to insulate Towns with defense-first wings meant he was rarely being guarded by centers anyway. The Knicks now have to decide what the optimal positional balance for Towns is, and how they can achieve that balance. It might be their most pressing roster-building question. <figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788704/cropped_GettyImages-2193738883.jpg?ts=1748971035" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788704/w220xh124_GettyImages-2193738883.jpg?ts=1748971035 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788704/w320xh180_GettyImages-2193738883.jpg?ts=1748971035 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788704/w640xh360_GettyImages-2193738883.jpg?ts=1748971035 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788704/w768xh432_GettyImages-2193738883.jpg?ts=1748971035 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788704/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2193738883.jpg?ts=1748971035 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> David Berding / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>Both teams are in tricky spots with their mercurial stars, for different reasons: The Knicks because Towns is owed $171 million over the next three years (assuming he exercises his 2027-28 player option) and will likely be looking for an extension, and the Wolves because Randle is likely to decline his $31-million player option and become a free agent.Tax penalties loom for both, but the Knicks are in a more comfortable spot. They're a few million under the first apron with their top seven rotation players all under contract. The Wolves, meanwhile, have to wrangle with the free agencies of Naz Reid and Nickeil Alexander-Walker on top of Randle's, and they probably can't re-sign all three without blowing past the second apron for a second straight year. Considering that long-term salary relief seemed to be a major impetus for the trade, it's hard to imagine Minnesota immediately consigning itself to tax hell. But losing any of those three free agents for nothing would be a huge blow, and losing Randle would be particularly damaging to a team that's already precariously light on secondary creation beside Anthony Edwards. I'm not sure Reid is fully ready to step into his role. And that's to say nothing of the optics of letting Randle walk a year after acquiring him in exchange for a franchise pillar. Maybe there's still a way this works out for Minnesota, with Randle picking up his option or re-signing at a discounted rate due to a lack of free-agent suitors. Maybe there's a sign-and-trade deal out there that can help the Wolves get financially leaner while remaining deep and versatile. Maybe there's even a deal that can land them Kevin Durant. They have to hope at least one of those scenarios comes to pass. Because for all Towns' flaws, and for as jarring as the sticker shock of his contract might be, I'd rather be the team paying him 35% of the cap for his age 30-32 seasons than the one that gave him away either for one year of Randle or for the right to pay Randle slightly less money.So, there are a lot of different facets to consider in all this, including the fact that DiVincenzo (who's locked up on a bargain contract for two more seasons) helped make depth a strength for Minnesota while New York was left feeling pretty thin. That makes it difficult to declare a winner or loser of this trade after Year 1. The picture will get a lot clearer as the deal ages, starting immediately with what happens this offseason.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31460261/related

Assessing the KAT-Randle trade after Year 1 

Every year, 29 teams fall short of the ultimate goal, and every year, those 29 teams ask themselv...

Every year, 29 teams fall short of the ultimate goal, and every year, those 29 teams ask themselves how they can take the next step.We previously looked at how the first-round outs in the <a href="https://thescore.com/news/3279346">East</a> and <a href="https://thescore.com/news/3281141">West</a> might go about answering that question, and then we examined the decisions on the horizon for the <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3286936" href="https://thescore.com/news/3286936">four</a> <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3288433" href="https://thescore.com/news/3288433">teams</a> who lost in the conference semis. Now that the conference finals are complete, here's a look at how New York and Minnesota can move forward after being eliminated.<h3>New York Knicks</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788549/cropped_GettyImages-2213356237.jpg?ts=1748882654" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788549/w220xh124_GettyImages-2213356237.jpg?ts=1748882654 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788549/w320xh180_GettyImages-2213356237.jpg?ts=1748882654 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788549/w640xh360_GettyImages-2213356237.jpg?ts=1748882654 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788549/w768xh432_GettyImages-2213356237.jpg?ts=1748882654 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/788549/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2213356237.jpg?ts=1748882654 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> David L. Nemec / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>However you feel about the long-term cost of all the moves Leon Rose and Co. made to put this roster together, and however dismayed fans might be about how the series against Indiana played out, it's hard to call the 2024-25 season anything but a smashing success for New York. <div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Great expectations came along with the pricey offseason transactions, but dethroning the defending champs en route to the franchise's first conference finals appearance in 25 years should qualify as exceeding those expectations. Until this year, no team had ever authored multiple 20-point comebacks in the same postseason. The Knicks did it three times. This was a very good and exceptionally resilient team. They also were clearly flawed, in ways that led to serious struggles against elite competition during the regular season (they lost all 10 games they played against the league's top three teams by record) and ultimately prevented them from capitalizing on a golden opportunity to make the Finals. For as great as they were offensively, Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns represented two defensive liabilities that the Pacers picked apart in the East finals. And their at-times dominant two-man game couldn't reach its full potential, in part because opposing defenses frequently cross-matched their centers onto the poor-shooting Josh Hart and put big, switchable wings on Towns.Hart contributed in myriad other ways, and OG Anunoby slotted in perfectly as a defensive destroyer who could insulate Brunson and Towns on one end and capitalize on their gravity at the other by drilling spot-up threes and attacking ferociously off the catch. But the team's triple-wing vision didn't fully come to fruition, in large part because Mikal Bridges struggled to find consistency at either end of the floor after the front office forked over five first-round picks for him in the summer. So, what should the Knicks do with all that information? What can they even do if they decide to shake things up? They have the security of their top seven rotation players (the starters, plus Mitchell Robinson and Deuce McBride) being under contract for next season. They also have approximately $189 million committed to those seven guys, which already puts them slightly over the luxury tax and only gives them about $7 million of wiggle room beneath the first apron to backfill the roster. And that's before considering potential extensions for Bridges or Robinson, whose team-friendly contracts expire next summer. Towns, who's owed $110 million over the next two years and has a $61-million player option for 2027-28, is extension-eligible as well.On the one hand, it's fair to wonder whether it makes sense to double down on a starting lineup that didn't entirely work. That quintet (the most used fivesome in the league) won its minutes by a modest 3.3 points per 100 possessions during the regular season, then got outscored by 6.2 points per 100 during the playoffs. Tom Thibodeau swapped Hart for Robinson after the Knicks dropped their first two games against Indiana, but that lineup didn't fare much better, getting outscored by 3.7 points per 100 despite sporting a monstrous 43% offensive rebound rate.On the other hand, it's hard to imagine New York cutting bait on Bridges or Towns just a year after acquiring them, especially considering the success those guys helped engender and the fact that the team would surely be accepting a huge net asset loss in any Bridges deal. It's also hard to picture a scenario in which trading one or both of those guys makes the Knicks better. It might make them deeper or more financially flexible, but the front office will probably be wary of taking any kind of short-term step back when the Eastern Conference figures to be wide-open in 2025-26.Bottom line: Even without a ton of upward mobility, New York's in a good spot. Each of the top seven players is 30 or younger, and this group has a chance to be better next season simply with a full campaign and lengthy playoff run under its belt. Even if no such gains are made, the Knicks will have a decent shot at coming out of the East. They might well have done so this year if not for the Pacers <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3289691" href="https://thescore.com/news/3289691">pulling off the impossible</a> in Game 1.There's a real chance for sustained success here. The Knicks obviously have to be open-minded if the right opportunity comes along, but I'm not sure aggressively rocking the boat would be the right approach. - Joe Wolfond<h3>Minnesota Timberwolves</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787179/cropped_GettyImages-2216904297.jpg?ts=1748882757" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787179/w220xh124_GettyImages-2216904297.jpg?ts=1748882757 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787179/w320xh180_GettyImages-2216904297.jpg?ts=1748882757 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787179/w640xh360_GettyImages-2216904297.jpg?ts=1748882757 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787179/w768xh432_GettyImages-2216904297.jpg?ts=1748882757 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787179/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2216904297.jpg?ts=1748882757 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> David Berding / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>It's tough to get a read on which direction Minnesota is headed. On the one hand, the Timberwolves made back-to-back Western Conference finals after winning just two playoff series over their first 34 years of existence. On the other hand, they appear to have stalled out, while teams like Oklahoma City, San Antonio, and Houston look poised to lead the conference into the second half of the decade.Complicating matters further, Julius Randle, who represents half of the return from trading Karl-Anthony Towns, and key reserves Naz Reid and Nickeil Alexander-Walker could all hit free agency. Retaining the trio would make Minnesota a second-apron team for the second straight year, which seems unfathomable under new ownership (or any ownership, for that matter). Trading Rudy Gobert would clear the team's currently blurry financial picture, but finding a team willing to take on the three years and $109.5 million owed to the big man isn't easy. Replacing one of the game's great defensive anchors would be even harder.The good news is that in Anthony Edwards, the Timberwolves already employ the type of game-changing young star who can serve as the backbone of a contender for the foreseeable future. He's a special player with an awesome presence about him, and he's already shown tremendous <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3293326" href="https://thescore.com/news/3293326">growth</a> beyond his (23) years.Defensive stalwart Jaden McDaniels, plus young guards Rob Dillingham and Terrence Shannon Jr., are all promising players on Edwards' timeline, which gives Minnesota some options. The Wolves could look to clear their cap sheet by trading veterans like Gobert and Mike Conley for younger players who can grow with Edwards, which would result in something of a gap year next season.Or, Minnesota could stay aggressive and look to turn some of its excess salary and promising youngsters into an established star like Kevin Durant, giving Edwards the type of help he needs to win now (though a lead guard might help more than another wing scorer). Given that the Wolves only control their own first-round pick once (2028) in the next seven drafts, the latter, more aggressive strategy seems more sensible. The only thing we can say for certain is that whatever the Wolves do this summer, optimizing Edwards will be at the center of it all. That's a starting point most teams would die for. - Joseph Casciaro

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31454093/related

What's next: Where Knicks and Timberwolves go from here

When the sting of another lopsided conference finals loss subsides, Minnesota Timberwolves fans w...

When the sting of another lopsided conference finals loss subsides, Minnesota Timberwolves fans will hopefully be left with the same perspective on their team's latest playoff run that their franchise player <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3293161" href="https://thescore.com/news/3293161">had already adopted</a> by the time the buzzer sounded on Wednesday's Game 5 Oklahoma City Thunder rout."It's exciting for me," Anthony Edwards told reporters from the dais, shortly after Minnesota's season ended the same way it did a year ago. "I'm 23. I get to do it a whole bunch of times." Unbridled self-belief has been a major part of Edwards' brand since he entered the league, but no one can say he hasn't earned it. Atop his foundation of preposterous physical gifts, he's built out a beautiful and ruthlessly effective game to the point that he's firmly a top-10 player in the world five seasons into his career.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>In the process, he's transformed a franchise that won two playoff series in its first 34 years of existence. With him at the reins, the Wolves tripled that total in just the last two years by conquering the likes of Luka Doncic and LeBron James, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, Kevin Durant and Devin Booker. The team's whole identity has flowed out from his fearlessness, his swagger, his assertiveness, and his willingness to get his hands dirty on defense.The series against the Thunder certainly wasn't Edwards' best, but it may have been the most illuminating because of the particular ways it challenged him - and the way he largely rose to meet those challenges. Throughout the series, he dealt with relentless pressure on and off the ball from a revolving door of all-world defenders. Any time he managed to shake one of them, he was met by one or two others. He was given no airspace, and none of his teammates were able to give him the reprieve he needed as a creator. Still, until he ran out of gas in Game 5, he continued looking for every opportunity to plunge into the belly of OKC's <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3293223" href="https://thescore.com/news/3293223">beastly defense</a> despite the suboptimal spacing around him.He'd already <a href="https://www.theringer.com/2025/05/28/nba/anthony-edwards-minnesota-timberwolves-footwork-nba-playoffs-2025">honed the footwork</a> required to navigate those tight corridors, but the sturdiness of his handle in traffic might've been the most important and encouraging development of these playoffs for Minnesota. That was reflected in the fact that he saw only a tiny blip in his turnover rate against a team that rips more steals than any team in the 21st century. Against one of the best and most help-heavy interior defenses of the pace-and-space era, he shot 63% from 2-point range, including 74% on his drives.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787897/cropped_GettyImages-2217574954.jpg?ts=1748548115" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787897/w220xh124_GettyImages-2217574954.jpg?ts=1748548115 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787897/w320xh180_GettyImages-2217574954.jpg?ts=1748548115 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787897/w640xh360_GettyImages-2217574954.jpg?ts=1748548115 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787897/w768xh432_GettyImages-2217574954.jpg?ts=1748548115 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787897/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2217574954.jpg?ts=1748548115 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> William Purnell / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>It was the culmination of a postseason in which Edwards navigated a variety of schemes designed to throw him out of rhythm and limit the damage he could inflict as a scorer. Almost without fail, he found the pressure points in those coverages and attacked them in the most effective way possible, whether that meant finding avenues to score or leaning into his evolving playmaking capabilities. He didn't nail every read against OKC, but he never stopped trusting the pass or creating great looks for his teammates by getting off the ball early and often. To wit: he passed out of 44% of his drives in the series, up from 33% in the regular season and 31% in the first two rounds of the playoffs, per <a href="https://www.nba.com/stats/players/drives?DateTo=&amp;PORound=3&amp;SeasonType=Playoffs&amp;dir=D&amp;sort=DRIVES">NBA Advanced Stats</a>.All told, his rim frequency leapt from 26% during the regular season to 35% in the playoffs. That's particularly notable because getting to the cup gets more difficult in the postseason (league-wide frequency dipped from 31.2% to 29.1% this year, per Cleaning the Glass). His ability to finish came and went as he dealt with heavy traffic in front of the basket, and he sometimes tried to force things because he didn't trust his mid-ranger enough, but the overall impact of his downhill pressure was massively positive. He also shot 55% from floater range, finding an important counter in an area of the court he'd struggled with for most of his entire career.Edwards is still far from a fully formed player. To get past the conference final stage, he'll need to become a more proactive playmaker rather than just a reactive one, continue developing his in-between game, and grow into a more proficient post operator, on top of making micro-improvements in areas where he already excels.But given the strides we've seen him take every year, it's easy to believe that he'll do everything to hit every item on that checklist. It's easy to believe him when he says, "Nobody's going to work harder than me this summer." And it's easy to believe that he'll have the Wolves back here again soon, with a great chance to clear the final two hurdles in their path.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31423258/related

Anthony Edwards' maturation was on full display this postseason

Early in the first quarter of Game 5 of the West finals Wednesday, Minnesota Timberwolves forward...

Early in the first quarter of Game 5 of the West finals Wednesday, Minnesota Timberwolves forward Julius Randle tried to run a pick-and-roll from the left wing. First, he got a screen from Mike Conley, which did absolutely nothing to dislodge Jalen Williams, the bruising Oklahoma City Thunder wing draped all over Randle. Then Randle got another screen from Rudy Gobert, which succeeded in bumping Williams off but invited an even bigger irritant into the action.Alex Caruso, the 6-foot-5 Thunder guard who regularly defends centers like Gobert, leapt out and snatched the ball from Randle between dribbles, then took it the other way and pitched it back to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for a dunk.A few minutes later, Randle caught the ball on the right wing and tried to attack the middle with his dominant left hand. Caruso, now guarding stretchier big man Naz Reid at the top of the arc, slid down to cut off Randle's driving gap. Randle immediately looked to kick the ball back out to Reid, but Caruso was moving back in that direction before the ball was out of Randle's hands. He picked off the pass and was once again off to the races, drawing free throws at the other end.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Things continued in that vein as OKC rolled to a 33-point halftime lead in its series-clinching victory. Reid tried to post up the smaller Cason Wallace, but Wallace took away his left shoulder, and when Reid tried to spin right, OKC center Isaiah Hartenstein was waiting to rip the ball out of his hands. Shortly thereafter, Reid tried to drive from the top, but Williams swiped the ball away with a strong-side stunt. Later, Conley was pressured by Gilgeous-Alexander along the sideline, tried to reverse course with an escape dribble, and had the ball poked away from behind. Another turnover, another run-out, two more points on the board for the Thunder. It went on and on.All the while, Wolves superstar Anthony Edwards struggled to find an inch of space while being face-guarded by Lu Dort and seeing waves of bodies the instant he put the ball on the floor. By the time the first-half buzzer sounded, Minnesota had 14 turnovers compared to just 12 made field goals, and OKC led 65-32. The rest was academic. The Thunder cruised to victory and punched their ticket to the NBA Finals, where they await the winner of Pacers-Knicks.It was a return to form and identity for an all-time great defense that got shredded in both games in Minnesota. The Thunder were demolished in Game 3 and only survived Game 4 because they put forth one of their best offensive showings of the year, with Gilgeous-Alexander and Williams combining for 74 points. Then they came back home and closed things out by doing what they'd done to opponents all year: overwhelming them with ball pressure and physicality, making every decision feel rushed, putting multiple sets of hands in every driving and passing lane, turning the middle of the floor into one big bear trap.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787839/cropped_GettyImages-2217575551.jpg?ts=1748533151" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787839/w220xh124_GettyImages-2217575551.jpg?ts=1748533151 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787839/w320xh180_GettyImages-2217575551.jpg?ts=1748533151 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787839/w640xh360_GettyImages-2217575551.jpg?ts=1748533151 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787839/w768xh432_GettyImages-2217575551.jpg?ts=1748533151 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787839/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2217575551.jpg?ts=1748533151 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Matthew Stockman / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>Edwards did all he could in the series, but he ultimately wore down because nobody else on the Wolves could puncture OKC's shell or maintain a live dribble in the middle of the floor. Randle and Reid couldn't find any mismatches to attack. Conley couldn't get anywhere or do anything. Gobert, who isn't the most polished offensive player at the best of times, was such a liability on the short roll that the Wolves had to stop passing him the ball entirely. Even in a second-round series that didn't feel comfortable until the second half of Game 7, OKC made Nikola Jokic's life miserable and held the Denver Nuggets to a 103.9 offensive rating. That's 15 points per 100 possessions below their regular-season average and the worst mark for any team in the conference semis.This iteration of the Thunder has <a href="https://www.thescore.com/nba/news/2909861">never abided by the unwritten rules</a> of NBA defense. Coach Mark Daigneault and his staff know that in this age of unprecedented offensive sophistication and firepower, the worst thing a defense can be is predictable. So OKC changes its help patterns from possession to possession, constantly keeping opponents guessing. Helping off the strong-side corner is supposed to be a no-no, but the Thunder do it all the time. They'll help from anywhere, off of anyone, and then scramble like maniacs to close whatever windows temporarily opened.They can "have (their) cake and eat it too, in terms of disruption and also discipline," Daigneault <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3217411" href="https://thescore.com/news/3217411">told me</a> earlier this season. They're "15 puppets on one string," as Edwards described them after Game 5. This is the Thunder's superpower, their cheat code, the thing that made them one of the most dominant regular-season teams of all time and catapulted them to a Finals in which they'll be heavily favored no matter who comes out of the East.This is how a team that looked rickety at the offensive end at various points during this playoff run, a team that had ice-cold stretches from 3-point range and crumbled in the face of Denver's 2-3 zone, a team that had tentative moments underscoring its youth and inexperience, still won the West with a plus-11.2 net rating. For now, that's the third-best mark for any Finals team in the play-by-play data era behind only the 2017 Warriors and 2001 Lakers.Anyone who continues to insist that defense doesn't matter in today's NBA hasn't watched this Thunder team. This is the best defensive unit we've seen in a long time, and it's four wins away from reinforcing the fact that defense still very much wins championships.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31421247/related

The Thunder's defense makes them nearly invincible

In an Eastern Conference final that's been wildly unpredictable from game to game, quarter to qua...

In an Eastern Conference final that's been wildly unpredictable from game to game, quarter to quarter, and minute to minute, the one surety is that the Indiana Pacers will find ways to poke and prod at Jalen Brunson's defense whenever the New York Knicks' diminutive point guard is on the floor. It's a big part of the reason the Pacers are up 3-1 in the series, one win away from their first Finals appearance in 25 years.It's notable that the Knicks' biggest runs in the series have come with Brunson on the bench. In Game 1, it was a 17-2 fourth-quarter stretch that would've won them the game if not for Aaron Nesmith's ungodly late-game heater. In Game 3, it was a 16-6 run spanning the last couple minutes of the third and the first couple minutes of the fourth, which gave the Knicks the lead in a game they'd once trailed by 20. In their nine-point Game 4 loss, they outscored the Pacers by seven in the 12 minutes Brunson sat.Those runs were defined by lockdown defense, enabled by Deuce McBride (and, in Game 3, Delon Wright) stepping in for Brunson and doing all the things he doesn't or can't: applying intense ball pressure up and down the floor, peel switching with speed and precision, stunting aggressively in the gaps, and recovering out to shooters with great closeouts. New York has a 129 defensive rating with Brunson on the floor in the series. It's 98.3 with him on the bench.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>It's a credit to Indiana's offense that it's managed to make New York's most important player a borderline liability. (It's also a credit to Tyrese Haliburton's vastly improved defense that New York hasn't been able to do the same to him.) Long story short: The Knicks can't win this series without a healthy dose of Brunson, but they also can't win unless they figure out how to minimize the damage the Pacers are inflicting by repeatedly attacking him.Of course, there's a reason Brunson can't defend with the same energy as the team's other guards. He's carrying an enormous offensive workload, leading all players in the conference finals in usage rate (36.4%) and time of possession per game (8.6 minutes). He's averaging 33.3 points and 5.5 assists on 62% true shooting against the Pacers. The late-game exploits that earned him Clutch Player of the Year honors this season are a huge reason the Knicks are where they are right now.Needless to say, they heavily rely on Brunson's on-ball orchestration and his ability to conjure buckets out of thin air in a myriad of ways. He's such a dangerous scoring threat with his back to the basket that the Pacers have occasionally hard-doubled him - a player measuring 6-foot-2 in shoes - in the post.For as much as his defensive deficiencies have hurt the Knicks in this series, he's carried them for long stretches at the other end of the floor. Their Game 3 win was particularly illustrative of this push and pull. Brunson re-entered the game early in the fourth quarter after New York made its big push to take the lead, then exited 90 seconds later after picking up his fifth foul. Over the next six minutes, the Knicks allowed just 10 points but scored only nine. Brunson checked back in and immediately hit a tough runner that wound up being the game-winning bucket.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787649/cropped_GettyImages-2216838208.jpg?ts=1748450058" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787649/w220xh124_GettyImages-2216838208.jpg?ts=1748450058 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787649/w320xh180_GettyImages-2216838208.jpg?ts=1748450058 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787649/w640xh360_GettyImages-2216838208.jpg?ts=1748450058 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787649/w768xh432_GettyImages-2216838208.jpg?ts=1748450058 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/787649/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2216838208.jpg?ts=1748450058 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> David L. Nemec / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The Pacers aren't your typical mismatch-hunting offense. They aren't above doing it, but they usually try to find those opportunities organically in the flow of their quick-hitting offense, rather than clearing out for a one-on-one attack. Their aim in roping Brunson into screening actions is less about creating individual matchup advantages than about putting the whole Knicks defense in rotation.If Brunson switches, it's a quick dribble attack to score or collapse New York's shell. Otherwise, it's a quick pass to beat the help layered behind him because the Knicks don't trust him enough to leave him on an island against the likes of Haliburton or Pascal Siakam. If he hedges to stay out of the switch, either the corner gets turned or the ball starts zipping and the blender gets turned on. Brunson is stout and strong, but he isn't especially quick laterally, and his hedges get lazier and more perfunctory as games go along. Indiana has gotten some of its best looks by attacking his show-and-recover coverage.The Knicks tried a different approach in Game 4. On several occasions, particularly when the Pacers involved him in double-drag action, Brunson remained stapled to his man (mostly Nesmith) when that player screened for Haliburton. That's a tactic you'll see a lot of defenses deploy when Nikola Jokic sets ball screens. (Nesmith certainly isn't Jokic, but he is shooting 62% from 3-point range this series.) It hinges on the defenders on the back line stepping up to deter the ball-handler at the rim.That didn't happen for New York, especially when Karl-Anthony Towns was the lone big man on the floor and pressed up on Myles Turner on the perimeter. The coverage directly led to four driving layups for Haliburton, along with a lay-down pass to Turner for an easy score. And that was far from the only way the Pacers exploited Brunson defensively.Nesmith and Bennedict Mathurin both burned him on cuts from the slot. On one possession late in the third quarter, when Brunson ceded the switch onto Haliburton, Obi Toppin came up to set a ghost screen. That peeled Brunson (who was clearly anxious to switch back out of that matchup) far enough away to gift Haliburton a pull-up three. Toppin's game-sealing triple in the final minute materialized when Brunson and Mikal Bridges miscommunicated a switch on a baseline out-of-bounds play. Bridges made it clear who he felt was responsible for the mix-up, staring down and jawing at Brunson afterward.There have been enough pops of self-creation from Towns, Bridges, and OG Anunoby to make you wonder if New York could stand to scale back Brunson's offensive responsibilities just a bit to preserve him. The Knicks need more effort from him defensively, and they also need to find ways to better protect him, which is much easier said than done. More pre-switching could help, but the Pacers make that difficult with how early they get into their actions.It's a little late in the game to expect any major shifts in the Knicks' play style; they aren't suddenly going to start playing a ton of zone defense to hide Brunson, or run their offense through Towns in the high post. But coach Tom Thibodeau has at least shown a willingness to make tweaks to his lineups and sub patterns in this series. He'll likely have to showcase even more adaptability if he's to help his team climb out of this 3-1 hole.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31413801/related

Brunson dilemma has Knicks on the brink of elimination

Midway through the fourth quarter, down 17 points, fumbling their way through a number of mental ...

Midway through the fourth quarter, down 17 points, fumbling their way through a number of mental miscues and seemingly running out of gas, there was nothing to indicate that the Indiana Pacers were going to win Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals in Madison Square Garden on Wednesday night. Nothing, except for the fact that they're the Pacers, and we'd already seen them steal games <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3282220" href="https://thescore.com/news/3282220">in historically improbable fashion</a> from the Bucks and Cavaliers in the playoffs' first two rounds.Even so, it didn't feel like the New York Knicks - who conjured their own incredible comeback magic to topple the heavily favored Celtics in the second round - were about to become Indiana's latest victims. They'd ratcheted up their defense, were executing with precision offensively, and had taken control of a previously nip-and-tuck game by putting together a 17-2 run with star point guard Jalen Brunson on the bench in foul trouble. Even as New York went into prevent offense mode late, Aaron Nesmith started banging threes to eat into the lead, and that familiar Pacers feeling began to creep in, it was clear the clock was going to run out on this comeback bid.The Knicks were still making shots, after all, scoring 12 points in the last four minutes of regulation. They still led by 14 with under three minutes to play, and by nine inside the final minute. Unfortunately for them, Nesmith downed a bottle of Steph's Secret Stuff before checking into the game with exactly five minutes to play and took the court as the greatest shooter to ever touch a basketball. He scored 20 points across those five minutes, shooting 6-for-6 from deep and canning two free throws after OG Anunoby intentionally fouled him in the corner as the Knicks clung to a three-point lead with 12 seconds to play.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>The Knicks almost threw the ball away on the ensuing inbounds play when Brunson got trapped in the backcourt, but his prayer of a pass trickled to Anunoby, who was quickly fouled. He split the pair of the free throws, which set the stage for Tyrese Haliburton to do this:<figure class="article-segment--embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
HALI DOES IT AGAIN 😱😱😱 INDY FORCES OT IN THE GARDEN! <a href="https://t.co/WKFxuuaPYV">pic.twitter.com/WKFxuuaPYV</a>— NBA on TNT (@NBAonTNT) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBAonTNT/status/1925384851043111020?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 22, 2025</a>
</blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></figure>It was Nesmith who got the Pacers back in the game, but of course it had to be Haliburton who completed the comeback, like he did against Milwaukee and Cleveland. That shot was the 11th Haliburton made <a href="https://x.com/pitlessball/status/1925397248357077135">this season</a> with a chance to tie or take the lead in the final two minutes ... in 12 attempts. The fact the ball kicked off the heel and careened 15 feet in the air before dropping through the net this time merely added to the aura of absurdity and inevitability surrounding him and the Pacers this postseason.His toe grazed the 3-point line when he launched it, taking some of the magic out of what otherwise would've been one of the most iconic endings in NBA history - complete with the Reggie Miller callback, with Miller watching from the broadcast table in the same building he silenced in similar fashion 30 years ago. Instead of icing the win, the shot merely forced overtime, but that just set the stage for more end-of-game Pacers theatrics.The Knicks scored the first two buckets of the extra frame and looked primed to stretch their lead to six points with Brunson driving down a seam. Then Myles Turner swooped in to block (or possibly goaltend) the layup attempt, and Andrew Nembhard drilled a three at the other end. The teams traded buckets from there until Nembhard (another frequent hero of these comebacks and this playoff run) slipped free of a spacey Josh Hart with a slot cut and finished a layup off a slick feed from Haliburton. At the other end, he shot the gap to deflect the Knicks' inbounds pass off Brunson and out of bounds. And then Rick Carlisle drew up a side-out play that sprung Obi Toppin for an insane double-clutch dunk. Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns missed pretty decent 3-point looks to tie, and Indiana somehow walked off victorious. Again.Coming into this postseason, only one team in the play-by-play era (which dates back to 1997) had ever come back to win a playoff game after being down three possessions in the final minute of regulation or overtime: the 2014 Thunder against the Clippers in the infamous <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ycppm8f3Qto">Chris Paul meltdown game</a>. The Pacers have quadrupled that total in three weeks.Games in which they've erased deficits of 20, 20, 19, and now 17 points account for four of their nine playoff wins. They might singlehandedly force a recalibration of a whole bunch of win-probability models, because in what universe can a team overcome 99% odds of defeat multiple times the same postseason? How can you watch any of their remaining games in these playoffs and ever think they're out of it?In searching for comparisons to this team, the only one I could come up with was the 2011 Dallas Mavericks, who authored multiple double-digit fourth-quarter comebacks of their own (albeit none this dramatic in the final minute) en route to the championship. These Pacers obviously have a long way to go if they want to enshrine their legacy in the same fashion, but their coach knows a thing or two about that:<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786851/cropped_GettyImages-115951968.jpg?ts=1747926852" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786851/w220xh124_GettyImages-115951968.jpg?ts=1747926852 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786851/w320xh180_GettyImages-115951968.jpg?ts=1747926852 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786851/w640xh360_GettyImages-115951968.jpg?ts=1747926852 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786851/w768xh432_GettyImages-115951968.jpg?ts=1747926852 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786851/w1080xh607_GettyImages-115951968.jpg?ts=1747926852 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Mike Ehrmann / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>Those Mavericks hold the record for playoff clutch-time point differential in the play-by-play era, putting up a plus-71 in 50 such minutes. Dirk Nowitzki scored 66 points on 76.8% true shooting in those 50 minutes. Haliburton and the Pacers may not reach those raw totals, but for now they're 6-0 in games involving clutch time with a 56.3 net rating (Dallas finished at 60.3), and they're building a similar sense of inevitability.Whether or not the Pacers manage to keep this going and finish the job, this is a run that's going to be remembered for a long, long time. We've never seen anything quite like it.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31360845/related

We've never seen a team like these Pacers

Every year, 29 teams fall short of the ultimate goal, and every year, those 29 teams ask themselves how they can take the next step.We previously looked at how the first-round outs in the <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3279346" href="https://thescore.com/news/3279346">East</a> and <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3281141" href="https://thescore.com/news/3281141">West</a> might go about answering that question and examined the decisions on the horizon for the <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3286936" href="https://thescore.com/news/3286936">East's top two seeds</a> after their seasons ended in the second round. Now that the West semis are complete, here's a look at how two of the conference's last three champions can move forward after being eliminated.<h3>Golden State Warriors </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/774471/cropped_GettyImages-2201403240.jpg?ts=1747692294" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/774471/w220xh124_GettyImages-2201403240.jpg?ts=1747692294 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/774471/w320xh180_GettyImages-2201403240.jpg?ts=1747692294 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/774471/w640xh360_GettyImages-2201403240.jpg?ts=1747692294 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/774471/w768xh432_GettyImages-2201403240.jpg?ts=1747692294 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/774471/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2201403240.jpg?ts=1747692294 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Noah Graham / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The Warriors were bitterly disappointed by their five-game elimination at the Minnesota Timberwolves' hands, but few teams have as clear a vision as Golden State does right now. The mandate: Win another championship during the two-year window in which Steph Curry, Jimmy Butler, and Draymond Green are all under contract for a combined average of $143.4 million per season.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>The three future Hall of Famers are all 35-37 years old with justifiable questions about their durability. Curry's absence did the team in against the Timberwolves, Butler hasn't suited up for 65 games in a season since 2018-19, and Green has reached the 70-game mark once in the last seven years. Still, even with those age-related concerns and Butler's diminishing offensive game, I'd take a healthy Steph, Jimmy, and Draymond against most teams' top three. Golden State went 23-7 (a 62-win pace) with Curry and Butler in the lineup down the stretch.If the Warriors can just get those legends to the spring in one piece, they'll have a legitimate chance to raise another banner before Curry retires. Accomplishing that starts with shoring up the rest of the rotation, preferably by adding some size and athleticism.The biggest question is what to do with restricted free agent Jonathan Kuminga, who has a big fan in team owner Joe Lacob but has often fallen out of favor with head coach Steve Kerr (though Kuminga did play well when he returned to the rotation during the second round). If he's retained at a reasonable price and can find some consistency, Kuminga can energize the aging core. But the best result for both parties seems to be Kuminga landing elsewhere in a sign-and-trade that delivers something of value for the Warriors too.Golden State just doesn't have enough dependable rotation pieces, let alone game-changers. Brandin Podziemski and Buddy Hield provide spacing; the former is younger, more defensively capable, and a better playmaker, but not necessarily more consistent. Moses Moody is probably the most underrated youngster on the roster, which leaves me wondering if the Warriors would be better served putting Podziemski on the trade market and Moody on the court.Trayce Jackson-Davis is a decent depth piece further down the bench and Gui Santos and Quinten Post were nice finds, but none of those three will alter Golden State's trajectory.If the Warriors can find a way to turn some of that middling talent into even a couple more playoff-proof rotation players, they'll be in good shape. They also have up to four first-round draft picks (plus swaps) to package with those players if they want to make a bigger splash. That seems unlikely, but never count the Warriors out of such discussions - they've got about $17.4 million worth of wiggle room under the luxury-tax threshold and roughly $25 million worth of space under the first apron. - Joseph Casciaro <h3>Denver Nuggets </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786356/cropped_GettyImages-2215278228.jpg?ts=1747692490" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786356/w220xh124_GettyImages-2215278228.jpg?ts=1747692490 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786356/w320xh180_GettyImages-2215278228.jpg?ts=1747692490 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786356/w640xh360_GettyImages-2215278228.jpg?ts=1747692490 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786356/w768xh432_GettyImages-2215278228.jpg?ts=1747692490 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786356/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2215278228.jpg?ts=1747692490 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> AAron Ontiveroz / Denver Post / Getty</figcaption></figure>This is a hugely consequential offseason in Denver with a ton of important decisions to make at every level of the organization. First: Finding the person who will make the rest of the decisions. Whoever steps into Calvin Booth's vacant role as general manager will quickly have to figure out how to make the necessary personnel adjustments while also deciding whether to conduct an external coaching search or make David Adelman's interim position permanent. (Adelman's performance after taking over with a week remaining in the regular season was a pretty persuasive job application.)In overcoming a very good LA Clippers team and then pushing the 68-win Oklahoma City Thunder to the brink, the Nuggets proved they're still a threat to win any series with a Nikola Jokic-Jamal Murray-Aaron Gordon nucleus. Jokic is a one-man offense who somehow got even better this year. Murray shook off a tough start to have a strong second half and a sporadically brilliant postseason. Gordon patched every defensive hole, bludgeoned his way to copious offensive rebounds and paint buckets, and hit some of the clutchest shots of the playoffs.But it also became abundantly clear, if it wasn't already, that the Nuggets need to make changes around that core trio if their championship window is to remain open while the 30-year-old Jokic is still in his prime.Outside of Gordon and Christian Braun, the roster distinctly lacks two-way players. This year's Nuggets had the best offense of the Jokic era teams despite ranking last in 3-point attempt rate, but that limiting factor became harder to overcome against playoff defenses that ignored about half the members of their eight-man rotation. Their bench was once again a complete disaster, with no reliable backup center or 3-and-D wing. That eight-man rotation was basically a 5.5-man rotation by postseason's end.What's less clear is how feasible the necessary changes are. If Russell Westbrook and Dario Saric pick up their player options (the former would likely be fine with Denver, the latter will be as damaging as it is inevitable), the Nuggets will be about $15 million over the tax line, $7 million over the first apron, and $5 million below the second apron with 13 of 15 roster spots filled. As things stand, they won't have access to the mid-level or bi-annual exception, nor will they be able to take back more salary than they send out in a trade. Plus, the only first-rounder they can currently include in a deal is their 2031 pick.Whether Michael Porter Jr. remains part of the aforementioned core might be the most pressing roster question. Porter's been a key piece of the Nuggets for the last six years. He played a vital role in the team's championship two years ago and brings the specific skill (shooting) that's in shortest supply in Denver. But his precarious health, shaky defense, and near-$40-million-a-year salary make him the most natural starter to trade. The problem is that those same factors would also depress his market. He might still be more valuable to the Nuggets than he is to anyone else.Braun made a strong case in his third season (and especially these playoffs) to be part of the team's long-term plans. He's extension-eligible this summer, and the Nuggets will surely try hard to come to an agreement with him. You can say everyone else should be on the table, but guys like Peyton Watson and Julian Strawther are about as likely to develop into the players Denver needs as they are to bring back those players in trades. The Nuggets would probably have to attach an asset to get off Zeke Nnaji's deal, which is worth doing if they can get any kind of competent rotation player in return (and possibly even if they can't). Maybe DaRon Holmes II can finally provide some stability at the backup five spot.For the Nuggets' next GM, the opportunity to retool around Jokic is both a blessing and a curse. On one hand, you can explore some unconventional possibilities knowing Jokic will find a way to elevate everyone around him and keep the team competitive. On the other hand, you'll be under immense pressure to meaningfully improve the roster while Jokic is still playing at this level, but you'll have limited pathways to do so.Nothing less than the legacy of one of the greatest players of this or any generation may depend on how that incoming GM navigates these next few months. - Joe Wolfond

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31340747/related

What's next: Where the Warriors and Nuggets go from here

Every year, 29 teams fall short of the ultimate goal. And every year, those 29 teams ask themselv...

Every year, 29 teams fall short of the ultimate goal. And every year, those 29 teams ask themselves how they take that next step.Here's a look at how the East's top two seeds might go about answering that question after both got bounced ahead of the conference finals.<h3>Boston Celtics </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786002/cropped_GettyImages-2213149460.jpg?ts=1747432975" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786002/w220xh124_GettyImages-2213149460.jpg?ts=1747432975 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786002/w320xh180_GettyImages-2213149460.jpg?ts=1747432975 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786002/w640xh360_GettyImages-2213149460.jpg?ts=1747432975 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786002/w768xh432_GettyImages-2213149460.jpg?ts=1747432975 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786002/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2213149460.jpg?ts=1747432975 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Boston Globe / Getty</figcaption></figure>Boston's title defense ended earlier than anyone expected, but the real story of the Celtics' second-round loss to the Knicks was Jayson Tatum's Achilles injury. The Eastern Conference semifinal didn't just see a champion dethroned - it immediately threw the franchise's future into doubt and shifted the league's balance of power.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>First and foremost, it's a shame for Tatum, a 27-year-old ironman who's never missed more than 10 games in a season and has logged 1,500 more minutes than any other player since his NBA debut (regular season and playoffs). As the best player on the defending champions and a two-way force who's been the backbone of this decade's most consistent contender, the Celtics will fall off without him. There were already questions about how long Boston's new owners would stomach massive luxury tax payments and second-apron penalties. By the time Tatum returns, the roster might look a lot different.However, Tatum's injury could change the calculus regarding his long-term partnership with Jaylen Brown. Trading Brown to maintain a financially feasible contender around Tatum would've made some sense before the latter's Achilles gave out. Boston should now look to take a step back in 2025-26, shedding salary in the short term to again build around Tatum and Brown in 2026-27 and beyond.Letting Al Horford walk as a free agent will be tough, but ultimately necessary. Ditto for trading Jrue Holiday, who's owed up to $104.4 million over the next three years and will likely be 36 years old when Tatum returns. If the Celtics can extract any value from Holiday's contract and Kristaps Porzingis' expiring ($30.7-million) deal, they should, no matter how many wins it costs them next season.If Boston can do that without taking on any long-term money, it could drastically improve its financial flexibility. Instead of sitting roughly $20 million above the second apron in 2025-26, the Celtics could position themselves with over $45 million worth of wiggle room under the first apron in 2026-27. And they'd still have Tatum, Brown, Derrick White, Payton Pritchard, and Sam Hauser (plus Neemias Queta, Baylor Scheierman, and Jordan Walsh) under contract. Boston also controls five of its seven first-round picks between 2026 and 2032.Tatum's injury was a <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3285701" href="https://thescore.com/news/3285701">disheartening reminder</a> of how fleeting success and windows of contention can be, but it doesn't have to be the last chapter for the Two Jays era in Boston. The Celtics just have to make a few shrewd decisions today to restart their course tomorrow. - Joseph Casciaro <h3>Cleveland Cavaliers </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786003/cropped_GettyImages-2206765602.jpg?ts=1747433257" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786003/w220xh124_GettyImages-2206765602.jpg?ts=1747433257 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786003/w320xh180_GettyImages-2206765602.jpg?ts=1747433257 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786003/w640xh360_GettyImages-2206765602.jpg?ts=1747433257 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786003/w768xh432_GettyImages-2206765602.jpg?ts=1747433257 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/786003/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2206765602.jpg?ts=1747433257 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Brian Sevald / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The 2024-25 Cavaliers won 64 games and produced the 16th-best relative offensive rating in NBA history. Kenny Atkinson won Coach of the Year in his first season on the sidelines. Evan Mobley made a major offensive leap and became the fifth-youngest player ever to take home Defensive Player of the Year honors. Darius Garland had a massive bounce-back campaign and earned his second All-Star nod. Donovan Mitchell will probably make the All-NBA first team. And every member of Cleveland's regular rotation besides Ty Jerome and Sam Merrill is under contract for next season. That's the good news.The bad news is that all those regular-season accomplishments didn't save the Cavs from a familiar fate in the spring. Their second-round faceplant against a fast, physical, relentless Indiana Pacers squad marked the third straight year their core four has experienced some degree of playoff disappointment. In light of those recurring letdowns, there will naturally be calls for the front office to break this thing up.The counterargument would be that serious mitigating factors contributed to Cleveland's demise, namely the injuries that sidelined and/or significantly hampered four of its five most important players in the series. Garland missed the first two games (both home losses) due to a toe injury and never looked right after returning. Mobley sat out Game 2 with a sprained ankle and didn't resemble himself again until Game 5. De'Andre Hunter dislocated the thumb on his shooting hand in Game 1 and was a disaster from that point on. Mitchell carried the offense with some heroic performances before succumbing to calf and ankle injuries and running out of gas.It was a particularly exasperating way for the Cavs' campaign to end considering how much they prioritized depth and managing their stars' workloads throughout the year. No one on the team averaged more than 31.4 minutes per game, which contributed to them being one of the healthiest squads in the league ... right up until they weren't. After injuries prevented it from taking a legitimate run at the Celtics in the second round last postseason, this was supposed to be the chance for Cleveland's core to prove its growth since an embarrassing first-round showing against the Knicks in 2023. Instead, the front office is again left to sift through a mess of conflicting information as it tries to determine what these guys are actually capable of.Some troubling issues cropped up in the series that Cleveland can't entirely overlook. The Cavs' beautiful offensive system broke down into a muddy puddle of isolations when things got tough. At the other end, Indiana gashed a defense that was supposed to be one of Cleveland's chief strengths, doing particularly vicious damage against switches and eventually solving the team's fail-safe zone. The lights again seemed a bit brighter than expected for Jarrett Allen, as he managed just 11 points and six rebounds combined over the final two games and was soundly outplayed by Myles Turner. And Jerome, who played a huge role in the team's regular-season success and finished third in Sixth Man of the Year voting, was exposed for his defensive limitations and reliance on tough pull-ups and long floaters.The Cavs can spend the summer thinking about how things might've been different if they'd stayed healthy or held onto huge leads in Games 2 and 5. But all that matters now is what Koby Altman and Co. decide to take away from all this, and how their interpretation of events shapes the club's course of action this summer. That could mean marginal moves like letting Jerome walk and handing over backup point guard duties to Craig Porter Jr., or trying to trade someone like Isaac Okoro to trim down their luxury-tax bill. Or it could result in something more significant, like moving out one of the core four.Cleveland can also just run it all back and enter next season as one of the clear favorites in a destabilized Eastern Conference. Mitchell is a proven superstar and a playoff riser, Garland and Mobley are still getting better, Allen is a top-10 two-way center in the league, and the wing corps is stronger than it's been at any point in this era. Last summer, the front office resisted the urge to make changes for the sake of changes, and the team <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3129495" href="https://thescore.com/news/3129495">wound up organically changing quite a bit</a>.Sometimes, the most courageous thing an organization can do after a disappointing result is ... nothing. No overreactions, no rash personnel moves - just a show of faith in the infrastructure that engendered enough success to establish expectations in the first place. We're about to find out how much or how little that faith has been shaken in Cleveland. - Joe Wolfond

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31324005/related

What's next: Where the Celtics and Cavs go from here

The Denver Nuggets' win over the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 6 on Thursday pushed the second ro...

The Denver Nuggets' win over the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 6 on Thursday pushed the second round's best series the distance. Game 7 in OKC on Sunday will be the biggest game of the postseason so far and the biggest test yet for this exceptional young Thunder core. Here are five questions whose answers will determine how the momentous contest shakes out.<h3>What's left to throw at Jokic?</h3>The Nuggets' biggest advantage in this win-or-go-home contest is that they have the best player - in this or any matchup - in Nikola Jokic. The Thunder, though, are one of the best defensive teams in modern NBA history and for about four games managed to give Jokic all he could handle.They threw everything including the kitchen sink at him, toggling individual matchups, mixing up pick-and-roll coverages, and scrambling his post reads with omni-directional stunts and double-teams. Jokic had <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3282220" href="https://thescore.com/news/3282220">a monster Game 1</a>, but after that, OKC learned not to let him attack Chet Holmgren without another big man on the floor, be it Isaiah Hartenstein or Jaylin Williams. Over the next three games, Jokic shot 33% from the field. Through Game 4, he had more turnovers in the series (23) than assists (21).<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>It was a different story in Games 5 and 6, as Jokic digested the coverages he was seeing (like he always does) and figured out how to attack them. The doubles stopped flustering him. He started attacking more from the top of the floor as a driver and pick-and-roll ball-handler. He started running more four-five action with Aaron Gordon, drawing both Thunder bigs away from the basket. (OKC ultimately tried to negate this by putting Holmgren on a wing instead.) Jokic scored 73 points on 26-of-39 shooting with just three total turnovers across the two games. This series might have been over already if his teammates had managed to convert more than five of his 20 potential assists into points in Game 5.Now the Thunder must figure out how to once again unsettle the genius who's gotten all too comfortable against their pressure. OKC's defense possesses a deep bag of tricks, and it'll have to burn through the whole thing in order to keep Jokic at bay in Game 7. <h3>Can OKC solve Denver's zone?</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784160/cropped_GettyImages-2203876094.jpg?ts=1747421451" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784160/w220xh124_GettyImages-2203876094.jpg?ts=1747421451 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784160/w320xh180_GettyImages-2203876094.jpg?ts=1747421451 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784160/w640xh360_GettyImages-2203876094.jpg?ts=1747421451 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784160/w768xh432_GettyImages-2203876094.jpg?ts=1747421451 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784160/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2203876094.jpg?ts=1747421451 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Zach Beeker / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>At the other end of the floor, the Nuggets have stuck to a pretty clear formula when jamming up OKC's offense. They've played zone on 19.2% of their defensive possessions, including 28.6% over the last three games, according to Synergy. For reference, the Heat had the highest zone usage during the regular season at 13.9%, and the Nuggets used it just 4.1% of the time.The zone benefits Denver by keeping Jokic from having to directly guard ball-screen action, but it's also tailored to crowd Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's airspace, especially in the middle of the floor. The defensive shell bends and moves with him, with a second defender shading over anytime he touches the ball. The Nuggets are more than willing to concede shots to role players like Lu Dort, Alex Caruso, Cason Wallace, and Aaron Wiggins if it means curtailing Gilgeous-Alexander's drives at the free-throw line.It's worked like a charm; the Thunder, who typically average about 1.05 points per half-court possession, have seen that number dip to 0.92 points on possessions against zone this series, per Synergy. That's the biggest reason the Nuggets' 21st-ranked regular-season defense has managed to hold the league's third-ranked offense 7.4 points per 100 possessions below its usual standard despite conceding 149 points in Game 2. Another indicator of how well it's working: OKC's driving the ball five fewer times per game than it did during the regular season, and it's converting those drives into points at a rate of just 48.5% (the lowest mark of any second-round team) compared to 60.3% during the season, per <a href="https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/drives?PORound=2&amp;SeasonType=Playoffs&amp;dir=D&amp;sort=DRIVE_PTS_PCT">NBA Advanced Stats</a>.The Thunder have applied all the conventional screen-the-zone counters, but because of their 3-point struggles (32.6% in the series) they haven't come up with a real solution other than attacking fast enough to prevent Denver from establishing the zone to begin with. Much of their fate in Game 7 rests on their ability to crack that coverage.<h3>Is J-Dub ready for this? </h3>Considering the way Gilgeous-Alexander is being guarded, and how desperate the Thunder have been for any kind of supplemental scoring or on-ball creation punch, you could make a strong argument that Jalen Williams has been the most disappointing player of the second round. His defense has remained extremely strong, which has been a vital ingredient in OKC's wins, but offensively he's looked completely lost and unprepared to meet the moment.He's struggled to figure out how to puncture the aforementioned zone, seems to have lost all confidence in his jumper, and can't locate his touch around the basket. He's shooting 40% from 2-point range (including 41% at the rim) and 21% from deep in the series. Things reached a nadir in Game 6, when he shot 3-of-16 and missed his last 10 field-goal attempts - many of which were either open threes or point-blank looks.There are a lot of reasons OKC hasn't looked like the same team that tore through the regular season (many of which have to do with Denver), but the biggest reason by far is that its second-best player can't put the ball in the basket. Gilgeous-Alexander has struggled with his jumper at points but has mostly pulled his weight. Holmgren had a tough start to the series but has steadily improved as it's gone along. Williams is the guy who most needs to rise to the occasion in Game 7. If he can't, there's a good chance the Thunder will be cleaning out their lockers Monday.<h3>Do the Nuggets have enough bodies?</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785969/cropped_GettyImages-2214700853.jpg?ts=1747421611" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785969/w220xh124_GettyImages-2214700853.jpg?ts=1747421611 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785969/w320xh180_GettyImages-2214700853.jpg?ts=1747421611 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785969/w640xh360_GettyImages-2214700853.jpg?ts=1747421611 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785969/w768xh432_GettyImages-2214700853.jpg?ts=1747421611 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785969/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2214700853.jpg?ts=1747421611 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Bart Young / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>OKC had the clear depth advantage in this matchup even before injuries and illness started to further tax Denver's shallow rotation. Michael Porter Jr. has been playing through a shoulder sprain that's completely squashed his most important skill; he's shooting 28% from three and 33% on mid-rangers in the series, and as a result has played fewer than 30 minutes in four of the six games. Making matters worse, Aaron Gordon, who's been a monster at both ends of the floor this postseason, tweaked his hamstring late in Game 6.The Nuggets' bench has been a liability all year, so the team isn't really built to sustain this kind of attrition to its starting unit. In Game 5, a desperate David Adelman opted to play both Jokic and Jamal Murray the entire fourth quarter instead of getting them their customary staggered rest, and while Jokic almost made the gamble pay off, Murray ran out of gas down the stretch. In Game 6, Denver got performances from Christian Braun and Julian Strawther that were tantamount to manna from heaven.With Gordon struggling, Braun - who had single-digit scoring outputs in three of the first five games of the series - stepped up with 23 points on 8-of-14 shooting to go along with 11 rebounds, five assists, and three steals. Strawther came off the bench and chipped in 15 points, which was more than he scored in Games 1-5 combined. Adelman gave him a bunch of Porter's minutes, and his flurry at the end of the third quarter turned out to be arguably the most important stretch of the game; it gave the Nuggets some separation and bought Jokic a few minutes of rest to start the fourth.The odds of Denver getting contributions like that from those guys in Game 7 are slim, but there aren't many other places to turn. Russell Westbrook and Peyton Watson will bring energy and make big plays on defense, but their shooting woes make them major offensive liabilities. They combined to shoot 4-of-15 and were the only Nuggets with negative net ratings in Game 6. One way or another, someone outside the team's core three will have to step up, especially if Gordon is hampered in any way. As great as Jokic and Murray are, even they can't overcome a team as deep and talented as OKC without significant help.<h3>Who wins the possession battle? </h3>The Thunder produced the greatest turnover differential of all time this season (plus-5.3 per game), and they've showcased that aspect of their identity in this series. Through six games, they've committed 33 fewer turnovers than Denver has. The Nuggets have made up for some of that with their offensive rebounding advantage, but OKC still holds a significant edge in shooting possessions.That said, the last three games marked a significant shift. With Denver - and especially Jokic - getting their turnovers under control, the possession battle has been played to a virtual draw. Considering how much the Thunder have struggled to score against Denver's set defense, it's imperative for the Nuggets to continue that recent trend of ball retention to mute their opponents' transition attack. On the other side, OKC must control the defensive glass and limit extra chances for a Denver team with an 88.5 offensive rating on first-shot half-court possessions.This has become a critical battleground across the NBA in recent years, and it's going to have a huge hand in determining which of these teams advances to the West finals.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31314170/related

5 burning questions ahead of Thunder-Nuggets Game 7

In my most anxious and introspective moments, I mostly just think about how fragile everything is...

In my most anxious and introspective moments, I mostly just think about how fragile everything is; how nothing lasts, health is precarious, accidents happen, and lives can be permanently altered in a microsecond. Most of the time, though, I live in the moment and push my existential dread into the recesses of my brain. I wouldn't be able to function otherwise.That's what life as an NBA fan can be like, too: living game to game, riding the ups and downs of each season, all the while trying to keep worst-case doomerism out of the frame. Given how hard it is for teams to pry open championship windows and how quickly we've seen so many of those windows slam shut, it's a lot easier to be a fatalist than an optimist. But fandom doesn't really work without optimism, so we do our best to ignore the voice in the back of our minds whispering that any flicker of joy is bound to be temporary.Then you see Jayson Tatum crumple to the floor after trying to push off his back leg while lunging for a loose ball, and that sense of fragility immediately returns to the forefront. Tatum ruptured his Achilles tendon on a freak play with three minutes remaining in Monday's Game 4 loss to the New York Knicks. In an instant, the 27-year-old lost at least one season of his Hall of Fame prime while his Boston Celtics lost their shot at another championship - not only this year, but quite possibly for the foreseeable future.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>It's devastating for Tatum, first and foremost. He was in the midst of one of his signature playoff performances, racking up 42 points (on 29 shooting possessions), eight rebounds, four assists, four steals, and two blocks before having to be carried off the court. He's worked tirelessly to turn himself into a top-five player in the sport, with a fourth straight first-team All-NBA nod surely coming his way.He's added layer upon layer to his game, complementing his shooting and finishing ability with pristine footwork in tight spaces, increasingly sharp playmaking reads against every type of pick-and-roll coverage, and a hearty embrace of screen-setting that's rare for star perimeter players. At the defensive end, he's made Boston's cross-match-heavy scheme sing with his ability to defend opposing centers, jockeying in the post and battling on the boards while staying prepared to switch onto the opponent's primary ball-handler at any moment.Availability has been one of his greatest abilities as well; he's never missed more than 10 games in any of his eight seasons. Tatum is young enough, skilled enough, big enough, and, at least to this point, durable enough to convince you he won't be totally railroaded by an injury that's railroaded so many careers in the past. Even so, some kind of physical tax has to be accounted for when projecting what he'll look like when he returns. Will he have the same burst going to the rim or finishing through contact? Will he be able to create as much separation on his side-step jumpers? Will he have the same pop as a weak-side rim-protector? Will he ever be this good again?<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785372/cropped_GettyImages-2214786703.jpg?ts=1747228806" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785372/w220xh124_GettyImages-2214786703.jpg?ts=1747228806 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785372/w320xh180_GettyImages-2214786703.jpg?ts=1747228806 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785372/w640xh360_GettyImages-2214786703.jpg?ts=1747228806 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785372/w768xh432_GettyImages-2214786703.jpg?ts=1747228806 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/785372/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2214786703.jpg?ts=1747228806 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Elsa / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>Every star injury is consequential, but not since the double whammy of Kevin Durant's torn Achilles and Klay Thompson's torn ACL during the 2019 Finals have we seen one with this kind of potential to destabilize a perennial contender. The Celtics are the defending champs, and they entered this postseason as betting favorites to repeat. Even if they'd gone on to lose their second-round series to the Knicks (which wouldn't have been a foregone conclusion even down 3-1, but certainly feels like one now), they'd have entered next season as one of the top three or four favorites to win the 2026 title with a healthy Tatum.Despite only having the one banner to show for it, the Celtics have been the paragon of sustained excellence in the NBA for the last eight years, having won more regular-season games and playoff series than any other team since Tatum was drafted. They came up a win short of the Finals in his rookie season, and he led the team in scoring in those playoffs. Over the next six years, he and the Celtics went back to the East finals four times and the Finals twice, with Jaylen Brown being the only other constant - a run that finally culminated in last year's ring.That run seemed as though it would continue in some fashion for a few more years, even with aging contributors on the roster and uncomfortable payroll decisions on the horizon. It was hard to imagine the Celtics drifting too far from the title picture as long as they had Tatum performing at this level. Now they're decidedly out of that mix, and it's not clear what kind of roster he'll return to when he's ready to take the court again for the 2026-27 campaign.Al Horford, who remains a shockingly important piece for this team, will be 40 years old by then. Will he still be around, let alone effective? Jrue Holiday is already in decline at age 34; what will he look like at 36? Kristaps Porzingis' health and availability will only become bigger question marks as he ages, and he's a free agent after next season. Brown, Derrick White, and Payton Pritchard will probably still be in Boston and performing at high levels, but everything else feels up in the air.Most pertinently, unless the Celtics shed significant salary this offseason, they'll become a repeat second-apron team with a luxury-tax hit that dwarfs the payroll of every NBA roster - including their own. That might have been palatable for Boston's new ownership group if the team was coming off a spirited repeat bid and looked primed to be firmly in the championship mix once again. That expenditure will be much harder to swallow for a team that could be hovering around play-in territory.In an age of parity that's now poised to produce a seventh different champion in the last seven years, these Celtics had a chance to stamp themselves as an all-time team. And while it's possible Tatum comes back 17 months from now looking no worse for wear, and Boston picks up right where it left off, there's a greater chance that he'll return a slightly diminished player for a significantly diminished team, and this era of Celtics basketball as we know it is over.If so, it was an awfully abrupt ending, but sometimes that's how these things go. In the NBA, as in life, you never have as much time as you feel like you're supposed to have. And you don't appreciate your best days quite enough while you're living them because you tend to imagine the future as more of the same. Tatum's injury was a stark reminder of how fragile all of this is, and, by the same token, a reminder not to take anything for granted.Joe Wolfond writes about the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31285327/related

Tatum's injury reminds us how fragile careers, teams are

Monday night's NBA draft lottery stirred up a lot of complicated feelings as the Dallas Mavericks...

Monday night's NBA draft lottery stirred up a lot of complicated feelings as the Dallas Mavericks were awarded the No. 1 pick and the right to draft Cooper Flagg despite having a mere 1.8% chance to do so going in.On one hand, not many of the league's fan bases needed it more. On the other hand, no front office or ownership group deserved it less. These are the same people who just traded a 25-year-old superstar mere months after he led their team to the Finals; the same people who only seriously engaged with one other team in the process, ultimately accepted a package headlined by a lesser star on the wrong side of 30 and one measly draft pick, and then offered up half-baked justifications for their approach while repeatedly throwing their erstwhile franchise player under the bus.For Dallas fans, this was the only possible way to heal the psychic wounds inflicted by the Luka Doncic trade. Before the moment the lottery machine improbably spat out one of their team's combinations, they had no path to any kind of recovery anytime soon. Not only was Doncic gone, but Kyrie Irving suffered a torn ACL that'll sideline him until he's a 34-year-old impending free agent, and Anthony Davis is already a 32-year-old walking injury risk. That was on top of the fact that the aforementioned front office ceded control of all its own first-round picks between 2027 and 2030 in an effort to build around the guy they ultimately traded against his will. There was no hope for the team's present and even less for the future. So, yeah, Mavericks fans needed this.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>I've seen some people argue that the Mavs deserved this more than some of the NBA's most shameless tankers because, rather than throwing in the towel after their catastrophic rash of injuries in the immediate wake of the Doncic trade, their skeleton crew played incredibly hard to secure a play-in spot and even win a game. So kudos to Naji Marshall, I guess. He earned this.But for neutral observers, fans of 29 other teams in the league, and probably even those recently disillusioned Mavericks fans, it just doesn't sit right that Dallas owner Patrick Dumont and general manager Nico Harrison get to feel like their galaxy-brained plan worked out. Their reward for casting aside a prime-aged, transcendent talent in the middle of a championship window is the chance to draft an 18-year-old prodigy four months later. And one who plays defense, no less! Where's the justice in that?<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/779154/cropped_GettyImages-2208740549.jpg?ts=1743957212" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/779154/w220xh124_GettyImages-2208740549.jpg?ts=1743957212 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/779154/w320xh180_GettyImages-2208740549.jpg?ts=1743957212 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/779154/w640xh360_GettyImages-2208740549.jpg?ts=1743957212 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/779154/w768xh432_GettyImages-2208740549.jpg?ts=1743957212 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/779154/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2208740549.jpg?ts=1743957212 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Jamie Schwaberow / NCAA Photos / Getty</figcaption></figure>Of course, when bouncing pingpong balls decide the fate of franchises, justice isn't meant to be part of the equation. But no matter the extent to which we intellectually grasp that reality, in our heart of hearts, part of us always wants to believe some degree of cosmic retribution is guiding this ridiculous enterprise. Not so long ago, it felt like the Mavs had <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3233078" href="https://thescore.com/news/3233078">cursed themselves</a>. So much for that.As for how landing the top pick will shape the team, it's almost as big a lifeline as the Mavs <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3207817" href="https://thescore.com/news/3207817">gifted the Lakers</a> back in February. Flagg has the makings of a two-way star, marrying elite physical tools with slick ball skills and advanced playmaking and defensive feel. Suddenly, the future in Dallas looks pretty bright.The big question is how this will change the front office's plans for the present day. The purpose of the team as currently constructed was to try to compete for championships over the next two or three years, but Irving's injury essentially nuked that plan. Flagg's arrival offers an opportunity to seamlessly change course, should the Mavs choose to do so.The Duke product should be able to make a positive impact as a rookie, but he won't instantly yank Dallas back into contention with Irving on the sidelines. There's obvious roster-building tension in wedging a teenaged cornerstone next to a 13-year vet in Davis on a team that likely won't compete for anything meaningful in 2025-26. At the moment, 21-year-old center Dereck Lively II is the only other high-end prospect on the roster. Would the Mavs consider moving Davis, despite what they gave up to get him, in order to rebuild from scratch around Flagg and Lively?That's not to say continuing on their current path would necessarily be a bad idea. The hope in that scenario would be that Flagg is good enough right away to essentially fuse two timelines into one. But if that is indeed the plan, Dallas will need to do some work to reshuffle a roster that's almost entirely bereft of guards and logjammed in the frontcourt.As fun as it sounds to watch gargantuan lineups featuring all of Flagg, Davis, Lively, and P.J. Washington - and as defensively suffocating as those lineups would be - the Mavs clearly need a lead ball-handler. Irving's likely going to miss all of next season, and there's no guarantee he'll be close to the same player when he returns. Dallas is almost certainly going to have to cash in some of its big-man depth in order to bolster its backcourt.Those are tomorrow's problems, though. The bottom line is the Mavericks now have real, viable, genuinely exciting options that they decidedly lacked 24 hours ago. They've been busted out of a prison of their own making, benefiting from one of the most egregious deus ex machinas in NBA history.All fan bases feel that they're owed something - even the most spoiled ones - and most wind up disappointed the vast majority of the time. Any of them would react to a rare win of this magnitude by finding a way to say, "We deserve this." And although we all know deserve's got nothing to do with it, that won't stop Mavs fans from reveling in this feeling of salvation a few months after experiencing the depths of helplessness and betrayal.Joe Wolfond covers the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31276745/related

Fortune favors the foolish: Lottery luck saves Mavs from themselves

It's hard to be surprised by anything at this point in these topsy-turvy playoffs, considering we...

It's hard to be surprised by anything at this point in these topsy-turvy playoffs, considering we're barely a quarter of the way through and have already seen more blown 20-point leads than in any other postseason in NBA history, and seven games in which the eventual losing team at one point had an implied win probability as high as 94%. Even so, what transpired in the first two games of Celtics-Knicks was difficult to believe. The fact the defending champs are heading to the Mecca in an 0-2 series hole against a team they swept in the regular season (with an average victory margin of 16.2 points) is surprising enough on its own. That they're doing so despite having led each of the first two games by 20 points in the third quarter is almost inconceivable.The way those losses took shape - with Boston shooting a combined 25-for-100 from long distance, continuing to hoist and clank away while their leads disappeared - ignited a familiar debate about the viability of a jumper-heavy approach that contributed to a championship less than 11 months ago. The usual handwringing about the Celtics' unimaginative offense and 3-point infatuation was met with the usual counterpoints about shot quality and shooting variance:<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div><figure class="article-segment--embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Boston underperformed its expected eFG by 15% in Game 1 vs. the Knicks, per GeniusIQ, its worst performance all season. Then the Celtics were 17% below expectation in Game 2. Blame the lack of offensive variation, sure, but this is also dreadful shooting luck.— Zach Kram (@zachkram) <a href="https://twitter.com/zachkram/status/1920298364534403394?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2025</a>
</blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></figure>Reasonable people can disagree about the level of luck involved here, but one thing we can say for sure is that the Celtics are going to live with the variance. Not only because they have proof of concept in the form of a Larry O'Brien Trophy, but because Joe Mazzulla is a process-oriented coach whose belief in his team's core identity runs bone deep. Even with their backs against the wall, these guys aren't going to fundamentally change who they are. They will, however, need to be much better versions of themselves for a full 48 minutes.Glass half full: The Celtics lost Games 1 and 2 by a combined four points despite catastrophic shooting that wasn't confined only to the 3-point line (they also shot 29% on non-rim 2-pointers). They generated good looks by hunting the Knicks' weakest links - namely Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns - which will matter more when they start shooting better than 25% on wide-open threes. And their defense, their most reliable calling card throughout this contention window, held the Knicks to a point per possession.The Celtics know how good they can be, and they've shot the ball better on the road all season, so they should be as optimistic about their chances of coming back as any team could reasonably feel after dropping the first two at home. They can come back to Boston tied simply by virtue of a few more open jumpers and floaters finding the bottom of the net. At the same time, the Celtics can't just bank on that possibility in the face of their current reality, which is that their margin for error has evaporated in a matchup that's clearly making them uncomfortable.New York's defense deserves a lot of the credit for Boston's scoring woes. OG Anunoby's done an unbelievable job hounding Jayson Tatum. Josh Hart's done strong work jockeying with Jaylen Brown. Mikal Bridges has unfurled his pterodactyl wings to come up with some huge defensive plays in crunch time, both on and off the ball. Mitchell Robinson's come in off the bench and locked down the paint to the point the Celtics have resorted to hacking him to get him out of the game.The Knicks are switching a lot more liberally than usual, even when that means leaving Brunson or Towns on an island with Tatum or Brown, and both those guys are battling their tails off to keep the defense out of rotation. What the Celtics really want is to get into their drive-and-kick game to create catch-and-shoot threes, because they don't actually shoot pull-ups all that well. But the Knicks aren't cooperating, and because of how they're defending, a way higher proportion of Boston's threes have come off the dribble in this series than they did during the regular season.The most pressing issue, though, is that Tatum and Brown simply haven't been good enough, not at punishing mismatches in isolation nor at creating for others when they draw help. They combined for nearly as many turnovers (16) as assists (17) in the first two games, combined to shoot 5-for-32 outside the restricted area in the second halves, and didn't get to the rim enough to offset how poorly they shot from everywhere else.To be fair, while they made some questionable decisions (like whatever Tatum tried to do on the final Game 2 possession), a few of their misses came on looks where they had enough time to check the wind and tie their shoelaces before letting it fly:<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784802/cropped_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_9.49.30_AM.jpg?ts=1746798604" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784802/w220xh124_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_9.49.30_AM.jpg?ts=1746798604 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784802/w320xh180_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_9.49.30_AM.jpg?ts=1746798604 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784802/w640xh360_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_9.49.30_AM.jpg?ts=1746798604 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784802/w768xh432_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_9.49.30_AM.jpg?ts=1746798604 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784802/w1080xh607_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_9.49.30_AM.jpg?ts=1746798604 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> TNT</figcaption></figure><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784803/cropped_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_12.16.12_AM.jpg?ts=1746798614" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784803/w220xh124_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_12.16.12_AM.jpg?ts=1746798614 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784803/w320xh180_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_12.16.12_AM.jpg?ts=1746798614 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784803/w640xh360_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_12.16.12_AM.jpg?ts=1746798614 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784803/w768xh432_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_12.16.12_AM.jpg?ts=1746798614 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784803/w1080xh607_Screenshot_2025-05-09_at_12.16.12_AM.jpg?ts=1746798614 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> TNT</figcaption></figure>In fact, almost all of the 14 consecutive field goals the Celtics missed during the fourth-quarter stretch that doomed them in Game 2 were objectively good shots in a vacuum. But watching all those empty trips one after another, it felt like the psychic baggage was piling up faster than the Celtics could wade through it. It felt like they needed to veer off course to escape a predicament of their own making, but only knew how to keep going straight. Attacking vulnerable defenders with your big wing creators is generally a great idea, but when those guys are struggling like Tatum and Brown are, it may be worthwhile to mix in more weak-side activity to try and make the defense move a bit more.Curling up into no-pass offense basically as soon as the Knicks start chipping away at their lead makes it seem like they don't trust themselves to execute well enough to maintain or build separation. It feels unbefitting of a team with Boston's pedigree and big-game experience, even acknowledging that these types of offensive droughts have been part of said experience.In both games, the Celtics eventually let the frustration of all their misses snowball into a lack of focus, a lack of cohesion, and a lack of calm. They let it bleed into their defense, which has surrendered a 127.9 offensive rating in fourth quarters in the series compared to 92.9 across the first three frames. You can't just chalk that up to the Celtics' own litany of missed shots, either, seeing as the Knicks have scored only 0.7 points per possession when <a href="https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/league/context?season=2024&amp;seasontype=playoffs&amp;start=05/5/2025&amp;end=10/15/2025#tab-offense_transition">running off of live rebounds</a>.Nothing better illustrated Boston's late-game skittishness than watching all-world defender Jrue Holiday pick up a senseless reaching foul that gifted Brunson the Game 2-winning free throws immediately after Tatum punched home a driving dunk to retake the lead.The Celtics can absolutely come back to win this series; they just need to play the way they know they're capable of playing and resist the urge to panic when they hit a rough patch. That won't be easy to do in what will likely be a ridiculously raucous MSG, but they should remind themselves they're still the champs and still the superior team in this matchup, and that the only thing they have to fear is fear itself.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31237240/related

The Celtics don't need to panic ... unless they keep panicking

What on earth is happening?   We're just four days into the conference semifinals, and already th...

What on earth is happening? We're just four days into the conference semifinals, and already this feels like one of the wildest second rounds we've ever seen. If your head is spinning from everything that's already transpired, here's a rundown of five more things you need to know. (Check out Wednesday's initial <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3282220" href="https://thescore.com/news/3282220">five takeaways</a>. I'll have more on Knicks-Celtics tomorrow.)<h3>Cleveland's season deserves a better ending </h3>The one thing that put a damper on the Pacers' dramatic Game 2 win is that it came against an opponent missing three of its five most important players. Injuries are helping to pave Indiana's path to the East finals for a second straight year, which is a shame because the Pacers are good enough to challenge or maybe even topple the Cavs at full strength.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>More than that, it's devastating that a Cleveland team coming off a magical 64-win regular season is facing the prospect of a premature playoff exit because it got banged up at the wrong time. The Cavs were one of the league's healthiest teams this season by <a href="https://www.spotrac.com/nba/injured/_/year/2024/view/team">total man games lost</a>, especially when factoring in the value of the players who missed time. Their core four combined to miss just 29 contests, a year after combining to miss 89.But now All-Stars Darius Garland and Evan Mobley are on the shelf, along with super sub (and frequent closer) De'Andre Hunter. It's unclear whether any of them will be available or have much to give as Cleveland tries to climb out of an 0-2 hole on the road. After how dominant they looked all year, and the way they pancaked Miami in the first round, the Cavs had real championship aspirations. At this point, though, it might take some <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3282220" href="https://thescore.com/news/3282220">Pacers-level magic</a> to keep their season alive.<h3>Donovan Mitchell is giving everything he has </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784532/cropped_GettyImages-2213813351.jpg?ts=1746641038" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784532/w220xh124_GettyImages-2213813351.jpg?ts=1746641038 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784532/w320xh180_GettyImages-2213813351.jpg?ts=1746641038 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784532/w640xh360_GettyImages-2213813351.jpg?ts=1746641038 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784532/w768xh432_GettyImages-2213813351.jpg?ts=1746641038 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784532/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2213813351.jpg?ts=1746641038 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Jason Miller / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>If anyone's capable of conjuring that magic, it's the guy who carried the Cavs to the brink of victory with 48 points in Game 2. All season, Mitchell has sacrificed individual stats and on-ball touches to <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3129495" href="https://thescore.com/news/3129495">facilitate a healthier team ecosystem</a>. But without Garland, Mobley, or Hunter by his side, and with Ty Jerome struggling under the increased burden (1-for-14 shooting), Mitchell had no choice but to play the brand of hero ball he was known for in the past. And boy, did he prove worthy of the cape.He was looking to get downhill and absorb contact from the opening tip. Over and over, he tore through the Pacers' first line of defense (shedding excellent point-of-attack defenders in Andrew Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith) and either finished over, got fouled by, or passed around their second wave of defenders. He <a href="https://www.nba.com/stats/players/drives?CF=PLAYER_NAME*E*donovan%20mitchell&amp;dir=D&amp;sort=DRIVES">drove 26 times</a> and scored 31 points off those drives. He shot 9-for-16 at the rim, 5-for-6 from floater range, and 17-for-21 from the free-throw line. If you factor in his nine assists, six of which set up 3-balls, he directly created 72 of the 98 points Cleveland scored with him on the floor.Mitchell's 46.2% usage rate in the game is tied for the highest from a player with at least 20 minutes played in any game in the last four postseasons. The only guy to equal that mark was … Mitchell, when he scored 50 of Cleveland's 96 points in Game 6 of the first round against Orlando last year. His 28 points in the paint Tuesday night were also tied for the second most by a guard in a playoff game in the play-by-play era. (Luka Doncic had the same total against the Clippers in the bubble. First on the list? You guessed it: Mitchell himself, with 36 in that Game 6 against the Magic.)It was a superhuman performance, and Mitchell did it on a balky calf. The Cavs won his 36 minutes by 13 points and lost their 12 minutes without him by 14. Some might wonder why Atkinson didn't just play him for longer; most coaches extend their stars' minutes to 40-plus in games of this magnitude. But given his usage load and the high-impact way he was scoring, those were 36 of the most arduous minutes you'll see, and Mitchell looked burnt out by game's end.Does he have another game like that in him? The Cavs have relied on their depth all year, but that may now be their only hope.<h3>Tyrese Haliburton is underrated </h3>Mitchell should've been the hero of Game 2, but instead it wound up being the guy who got showered with "OVERRATED!" chants before burying the game-winner. Those chants were fueled by an <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6296394/2025/04/22/anonymous-nba-player-poll-2025-mvp-sga-jokic-analytics/">anonymous poll in The Athletic</a> in which Haliburton was the leading vote-getter among his peers for the title of the league's most overrated player.It's hard to settle on who's overrated, underrated, or properly rated without relying on the most anecdotal evidence of who rates whom how highly. Everyone should know by now how good Haliburton is, having witnessed the latest cold-blooded dagger from the league's <a href="https://x.com/Carsobi/status/1919935901276287153">clutchest shot-maker</a>. That's on top of everything else that makes him a special offensive talent: the sublime hit-ahead passing, the simultaneously frenetic and controlled pace he plays at, his remarkably assured decision-making and abnormally low turnover rate. But it's the way Haliburton's been defending this postseason that I think deserves more attention.He's long had a justified reputation as a minus defender, but in the past two series, he's been a legitimate plus. He's been a menace on the weak side, jumping gaps and deflecting passes left and right. He still gets hunted relentlessly in ball-screen action because he's the most sensible target in a starting lineup featuring Nemhard, Nesmith, Pascal Siakam, and Myles Turner. But he's holding his own in those scenarios - whether hedging or switching onto the ball - and he's generally doing a much better job of keeping his man in front of him. He's averaging more than a block per game. Multiple times down the stretch of Games 1 and 2, a Cavs guard tried to attack him to no avail.To quote the man himself: "Overrate that!" <h3>Minnesota might want to remember how to shoot </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784112/cropped_GettyImages-2197144688.jpg?ts=1746641289" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784112/w220xh124_GettyImages-2197144688.jpg?ts=1746641289 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784112/w320xh180_GettyImages-2197144688.jpg?ts=1746641289 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784112/w640xh360_GettyImages-2197144688.jpg?ts=1746641289 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784112/w768xh432_GettyImages-2197144688.jpg?ts=1746641289 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784112/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2197144688.jpg?ts=1746641289 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> David Berding / Getty Images</figcaption></figure>When the Timberwolves went 7-for-47 from 3-point range in their Game 5 closeout against the Lakers last round, they set a new record for most missed threes in a postseason game. (That record has since been eclipsed by the Celtics.) They managed to win regardless, but they couldn't survive an 0-for-16 start en route to a 5-for-29 finish from downtown in Game 1 of the second round, falling to a Warriors team that lost Steph Curry to a hamstring strain early in the second quarter. It's the worst two-game 3-point shooting stretch for any team in playoff history.There's no great explanation for it. The Wolves ranked fourth in the league in 3-point percentage (37.7%) during the regular season, and were at 38.1% in the playoffs before their last two games. In those games, they shot 23.7% on wide-open threes, per <a href="https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/shots-closest-defender?CloseDefDistRange=6%20%20Feet%20-%20Wide%20Open&amp;LastNGames=2&amp;dir=D&amp;sort=FG3_PCT">NBA Advanced Stats</a>. As I <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3278053" href="https://thescore.com/news/3278053">wrote last round</a>, when a team plays center-less - as the Lakers did and the Warriors often do - that usually means they collapse aggressively to the middle of the floor and try to protect the rim by committee. The Wolves ranked 15th of 16 teams in at-rim field-goal percentage (59.8%) in the first round. They shot 17-for-32 (53.1%) at the rim in Game 1 against Golden State. They need to keep driving to put pressure on the Warriors' tiny frontcourt, and they can certainly finish more effectively, but they really need to hit their threes to punish that style of defense. Especially because Draymond Green is a much better rim protector than anyone on L.A., and he looks extremely locked in right now. That said ...<h3>Steph's injury could be curtains for the Warriors </h3>Curry's injury cast a major pall over Golden State's spirited Game 1 win, and he's already been ruled out for Games 2, 3, and 4. It's impossible to know if he can recover in time to return to this series because this is somehow the first significant hamstring injury of his 16-year career, according to <a href="https://x.com/InStreetClothes/status/1919951272657965328">Jeff Stotts of In Street Clothes</a>.The Warriors showed that they can win without Curry by relying on their hyperactive defense and getting just enough creation and shot-making from Green, Jimmy Butler, and Buddy Hield. But the Wolves will probably start making threes at some point, and Green probably won't make four of them again. Butler is still great, but he can't impact games like the Playoff Jimmy of old.The Warriors performed 13.1 points per 100 possessions worse without Curry on the floor during the regular season, and 20.4 points per 100 worse with him on the bench in the first round of the playoffs. They played to an 83.5 half-court offensive rating in Game 1 against Minnesota. Absent his unparalleled gravity, their lineups with two or three non-shooters just don't really work. The hope is they can keep the Wolves at bay long enough for Curry to return and save them, but it's hard to see how they'll score enough to do that.Joe Wolfond covers the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31227536/related

5 more takeaways from a bonkers start to the 2nd round

What on earth is happening?   We're just three days into the conference semifinals, and already t...

What on earth is happening? We're just three days into the conference semifinals, and already this feels like one of the wildest second rounds we've ever seen. If your head is spinning from everything that's transpired, here's a rundown of five things you need to know, with five more coming tomorrow.Note: I'll have more on Knicks-Celtics later in the week, so that series doesn't feature as prominently here. And I'll have thoughts on Warriors-Timberwolves and Cavaliers-Pacers in Thursday's takeaways.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div><h3>There's no place like road </h3>Since the NBA moved to a 16-team playoff format in 1984, there's never been a second round in which the road teams won every Game 1. At least that was the case until Indiana, New York, Denver, and Golden State pulled off the feat this week. With the Pacers also stealing a second game in Cleveland on Tuesday night, visiting teams are now 5-0 to start the conference semis.But what's made this round feel so wild and unpredictable isn't just that all the lower-seeded teams have immediately snatched home-court advantage - it's how those games have been won.<h3>Crazy comebacks and endgame fiascos</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784555/cropped_GettyImages-2213152947.jpg?ts=1746646342" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784555/w220xh124_GettyImages-2213152947.jpg?ts=1746646342 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784555/w320xh180_GettyImages-2213152947.jpg?ts=1746646342 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784555/w640xh360_GettyImages-2213152947.jpg?ts=1746646342 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784555/w768xh432_GettyImages-2213152947.jpg?ts=1746646342 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784555/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2213152947.jpg?ts=1746646342 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Boston Globe / Getty</figcaption></figure>We're not even halfway into the playoffs, and we've already seen <a href="https://x.com/keerthikau/status/1919933955467317464">more 20-point comebacks</a> than in any other postseason in the play-by-by era, which dates back to 1997. Two of those came in the last two days, with the Knicks and Pacers both roaring back from 20 down to stun the Celtics and Cavaliers, respectively. And while the Nuggets never faced quite that large a deficit in their Game 1 win in Oklahoma City, their comeback was nearly as unthinkable. To put some numbers to it, let's use Inpredictable's <a href="https://stats.inpredictable.com/nba/wpBox_live.php">win probability tracker</a>. The Celtics' Game 1 win probability peaked at 96.8%, when Derrick White hit a three to give them a 75-55 lead with under six minutes to play in the third quarter. The Thunder's probability reached as high as 97.5%, when Shai Gilgeous-Alexander buried a step-back that put them up 11 with just over four minutes left in the fourth. And the Cavaliers' likelihood of victory in their Game 2 crested at 99.6%, in the split-second between Pacers forward Pascal Siakam missing a free throw and Aaron Nesmith ramming home a putback dunk with Indiana trailing by seven and 47 seconds remaining.The wild swings in those games were defined not only by clutch shot-making and pristine execution by the winning teams, but by sloppy play and catastrophic decision-making by the losers. The Thunder's inflexible endgame strategy backfired spectacularly, as we covered <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3281423" href="https://thescore.com/news/3281423">here</a>. The Celtics missed a cavalcade of threes and completely let go of the rope at the defensive end, surrendering run-outs, back cuts, and clean catch-and-shoot looks. Jaylen Brown and Jrue Holiday miscommunicated a switch to gift Jalen Brunson a wide-open three that put the Knicks up six late in regulation. After Boston came back to tie it, Brown made the disastrous decision to double OG Anunoby from the strong side on a post-up against Jayson Tatum, conceding a Mikal Bridges three that held up as the winning bucket in overtime. (Brown had a rough game all around).But Indiana's comeback - or Cleveland's collapse, depending on how you look at it - deserves its own category.<h3>Pacers' devil magic</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784529/cropped_GettyImages-2213222495.jpg?ts=1746640888" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784529/w220xh124_GettyImages-2213222495.jpg?ts=1746640888 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784529/w320xh180_GettyImages-2213222495.jpg?ts=1746640888 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784529/w640xh360_GettyImages-2213222495.jpg?ts=1746640888 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784529/w768xh432_GettyImages-2213222495.jpg?ts=1746640888 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784529/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2213222495.jpg?ts=1746640888 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> David Liam Kyle / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The Miami Heat had a good run, but a different team now wields the sorcery capable of crafting inexplicable playoff outcomes.Up until a week ago, only one team in the play-by-play era had ever come back to win a playoff game after being down three possessions in the final minute of regulation or overtime - the 2014 Thunder against the Clippers in the infamous <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ycppm8f3Qto">Chris Paul meltdown game</a>. In over 1,500 such scenarios, every other team had lost. The Pacers have since made that comeback twice in three games, first to close out the Bucks and then to go up 2-0 on the Cavs.As mentioned above, Cleveland led Game 2 by seven with 47 seconds on the game clock when Siakam missed the second of two free throws. Here's what happened after that:<ul>
<li>Nesmith putback dunk, five-point game</li>
<li>Donovan Mitchell offensive foul in the backcourt, Pacers ball, Mitchell to the bench</li>
<li>Jarrett Allen blocks Tyrese Haliburton, Cavs can't corral the loose ball, Pacers retain possession</li>
<li>Siakam driving layup, three-point game</li>
<li>Kenny Atkinson calls his final timeout to reinsert Mitchell, Cavs throw the ensuing inbounds pass right to the Pacers</li>
<li>Mitchell called for a questionable foul on Haliburton, Cavs can't challenge because they're out of timeouts</li>
<li>Haliburton makes the first free throw, two-point game</li>
<li>He (intentionally?) misses the second, Myles Turner taps the rebound back to him, he dribbles it out to isolate against Ty Jerome and hits a go-ahead step-back three with 1.1 seconds to go</li>
<li>Cavs can't advance the ball (again, no timeouts left), Sam Merrill's heave isn't close, ballgame over</li>
</ul>Take nothing away from the Pacers, who have done everything right on these last-minute possessions with zero margin for error. But they've also needed some fortuitous bounces, on top of their opponents completely falling apart mentally and physically, for their comebacks to be possible. Indiana's an undeniably skilled team, but was it skill that caused Gary Trent Jr. to forget how to hold a basketball? Or the Cavs to forget how to box out or inbound the ball? Nah, that was pure voodoo.<h3>Nikola Jokic is best at this</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784533/cropped_GettyImages-2213104604.jpg?ts=1746641165" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784533/w220xh124_GettyImages-2213104604.jpg?ts=1746641165 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784533/w320xh180_GettyImages-2213104604.jpg?ts=1746641165 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784533/w640xh360_GettyImages-2213104604.jpg?ts=1746641165 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784533/w768xh432_GettyImages-2213104604.jpg?ts=1746641165 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784533/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2213104604.jpg?ts=1746641165 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> AAron Ontiveroz / Denver Post / Getty</figcaption></figure>Simply put, everyone in the second round has been outshined by Jokic. That'll happen when the three-time MVP goes for 42 points and 22 rebounds in a stunning upset against one of the best defensive teams in modern NBA history.The Thunder tried everything under the sun in their attempts to slow Jokic down. They put Chet Holmgren on him while Isaiah Hartenstein roamed off Aaron Gordon, they tried Hartenstein on him while Holmgren roamed off Gordon, they pre-rotated to try and take away his short rolls, they veer-switched smaller guys onto him to take away his pick-and-pops, they had wings stunting and digging down on his dribble, they tried hard-doubling and soft-doubling him in the post. They forced him into seven turnovers. But pivot after reverse pivot, push shot after push shot, offensive rebound after offensive rebound, he kept finding his way to his sweet spots and kept Denver in the game long enough for OKC to collapse. This series is a clash of the two overwhelming MVP favorites, and while it shouldn't be a referendum on who wins the regular-season award - there's a strong case to be made that Gilgeous-Alexander had the better campaign - it's perfectly fine to use it as evidence that Jokic is undoubtedly still the best player in the world. That may not be enough to win the Nuggets the series, but it should be enough to put the fear of God in the 68-win Thunder.<h3>SGA's co-stars are back under the microscope </h3>Even if he wasn't on Jokic's level, Gilgeous-Alexander was brilliant in his own right in Game 1, pouring in 33 points, 10 rebounds, and eight assists and making a handful of big shots down the stretch. It was his two co-stars, Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren, who faded while the Nuggets stormed back.Williams was characteristically awesome defensively, but he shot 1-for-7 in the fourth quarter and 5-for-20 in the game, missing badly on his jumpers when he wasn't barreling into traffic without a plan. Holmgren barely touched the ball in the final frame and struggled throughout the game to get anything going when the Nuggets defended him with wings and stashed Jokic elsewhere. At the other end, he blocked four shots but also got physically overwhelmed by both Jokic and Gordon at points, contributing to Denver's 21 offensive rebounds. He also missed a pair of free throws to set the stage for Gordon's game-winning three. It wouldn't have been so disconcerting if it didn't look so similar to last year's second round, when Gilgeous-Alexander pulled his weight but couldn't get his teammates to come along for the ride. Williams and Holmgren, in particular, need to be able to relieve the pressure on him. Until they prove they can, the pressure will also be squarely on them.Joe Wolfond covers the NBA for theScore.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31220526/related

5 takeaways from an absolutely bonkers start to the 2nd round

Every year, 29 teams fall short of the ultimate goal, and every year, those 29 teams ask themselves how they can take the next step.We've already looked at how the <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3279346" href="https://thescore.com/news/3279346">Eastern Conference's four eliminated teams</a> may go about answering that question. Here's what's on tap for the first-round outs from the West.<h3>Houston Rockets </h3>The Rockets should feel as good as possible for a 2-seed that was bounced in the first round. They were a 22-win tire fire just two years ago. This season, they won 52 games in a loaded Western Conference, had the league's fourth-ranked defense, and pushed a pedigreed Warriors team led by three future Hall of Famers to a Game 7. While veterans Fred VanVleet, Dillon Brooks, and Steven Adams had huge hands in Houston's success, the team was also powered by a talented youth brigade for whom the future looks very bright.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Big man Alperen Sengun was an All-Star at 22 and had a strong playoff showing despite struggling with his touch all year. Sophomore Amen Thompson, the most explosive athlete in the league outside of his twin brother Ausar, broke out as a two-way stud with legitimate superstar potential. Jabari Smith Jr., a versatile third-year forward who's even younger than Thompson, continued to establish himself as an ideal gap-filling role player. Tari Eason kept growing into one of the best defensive playmakers in the league. <figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784175/cropped_GettyImages-2212190173.jpg?ts=1746471280" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784175/w220xh124_GettyImages-2212190173.jpg?ts=1746471280 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784175/w320xh180_GettyImages-2212190173.jpg?ts=1746471280 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784175/w640xh360_GettyImages-2212190173.jpg?ts=1746471280 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784175/w768xh432_GettyImages-2212190173.jpg?ts=1746471280 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/784175/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2212190173.jpg?ts=1746471280 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Logan Riely / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>That said, the Rockets' loss to Golden State - and their season as a whole - provided some obvious lessons they'll carry into a fascinating offseason. Above all, the offense needs to improve dramatically. They finished bottom 10 in shooting percentage from every quadrant on the floor: 21st from 3-point range, 23rd from long mid-range, 26th from floater range, and 22nd at the rim. And though their 22nd-ranked half-court offense was buoyed by the league's best offensive rebound rate and a top-10 transition attack, that wasn't enough to overcome a 92.4 offensive rating on first-shot possessions against a set Warriors defense.The front office's big decision comes down to whether it believes the necessary improvements can come from within or whether the team has to look externally. Houston's biggest need is upgrading its off-the-dribble shot creation, and as good as Sengun and Thompson are - and can eventually become - the internal options seem unlikely to address that deficiency.Jalen Green's place in the team's future feels particularly hazy as he enters the first year of a three-year extension. While he's innately talented and has made strides in the last couple years, his shot selection and overall decision-making remain far too erratic for him to be relied upon by a contending team. The Rockets wouldn't be wrong to exercise patience with the 23-year-old, but they'd also be justified in cutting bait if there's a market for his services.This team looks ripe for a consolidation trade: Houston's got more intriguing young players than its rotation can currently accommodate (looking at you, Reed Sheppard and Cam Whitmore) and a bundle of surplus draft picks including three unprotected first-rounders from the beleaguered Suns and one from the even more beleaguered Mavericks. The possibility of trading those picks back to Phoenix makes the Rockets a sensible landing spot for Kevin Durant or (in a more ideal scenario) Devin Booker. Giannis Antetokounmpo could also be available this summer, and while he wouldn't fix their shooting woes, he'd still launch them into a different stratum of contention because he's Giannis Antetokounmpo.The front office also has to decide whether to pick up VanVleet's $45-million team option after a regular season in which he shot under 38% from the field followed by a playoff series in which he was Houston's most important offensive player. The Rockets are already dangerously light on ball-handling and pull-up shooting, and they wouldn't be able to replace VanVleet's value via this barren free-agent class. But opening up cap space by renouncing him could allow them to absorb a star in a trade without having to send back matching salary. They could also just try to re-sign VanVleet to a longer-term deal with a lower average annual value.Adams, who was instrumental in pushing the Warriors to seven and had the best individual net rating (plus-14.1) in the series, is a free agent as well. Smith and Eason are eligible for extensions. That's a lot of consequential decisions to make in a short amount of time, and while there aren't many bad choices for a team in Houston's position, this feels like a potential fork-in-the-road summer that could lead the team in any number of directions. - Joe Wolfond <h3>Los Angeles Lakers </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/780153/cropped_GettyImages-2208313373.jpg?ts=1746471314" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/780153/w220xh124_GettyImages-2208313373.jpg?ts=1746471314 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/780153/w320xh180_GettyImages-2208313373.jpg?ts=1746471314 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/780153/w640xh360_GettyImages-2208313373.jpg?ts=1746471314 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/780153/w768xh432_GettyImages-2208313373.jpg?ts=1746471314 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/780153/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2208313373.jpg?ts=1746471314 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Joe Murphy / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>Although it can be hard to see the forest for the trees in the immediate, emotional aftermath of a disappointing postseason elimination, the Lakers are in great shape. Turning Anthony Davis into Luka Doncic brought immediate promise, but this team was always going to be incomplete in the short term, especially when Los Angeles' deadline-day deal for fragile Hornets center Mark Williams fell through.The real work to build a genuine contender around Doncic and LeBron James begins now. Assuming James is back (the 40-year-old has a $52.6-million player option for next season), there are a couple ways the Lakers can go about this. First, they could run it back with a trio of Doncic, James, and Austin Reaves while filling their glaring hole at center and adding some quality depth. That's the more conservative path. Some might argue the Lakers should be more aggressive to maximize what could be James' last year or two, but they've also got a Doncic-led future to plan for. Plus, a team featuring Doncic, James, and Reaves with a more balanced supporting cast would enter next season as a fringe contender at worst.The more aggressive option would be to dangle Reaves, salary filler, and draft picks on the trade market. In addition to swap rights in 2026, 2028, and 2030, the Lakers still have their 2031 first-rounder and will get access to their 2032 first-rounder once this year's draft is complete. That might not be enough to land another superstar, but the Lakers don't need one. It surely is enough to land an impact player - perhaps one who's a better fit between Doncic and James than Reaves. - Joseph Casciaro <h3>LA Clippers</h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783634/cropped_GettyImages-2212092486.jpg?ts=1746471526" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783634/w220xh124_GettyImages-2212092486.jpg?ts=1746471526 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783634/w320xh180_GettyImages-2212092486.jpg?ts=1746471526 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783634/w640xh360_GettyImages-2212092486.jpg?ts=1746471526 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783634/w768xh432_GettyImages-2212092486.jpg?ts=1746471526 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783634/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2212092486.jpg?ts=1746471526 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Juan Ocampo / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>For the first time since Kawhi Leonard tore his ACL partway through the second round in 2021, things seemed to be lined up for the Clippers to make noise in the postseason. Leonard was healthy and operating near the peak of his powers, James Harden still had gas in the tank, and the surrounding roster was deep and versatile. They finished the regular season as the hottest team in the league, and their first-round opponent was a comparatively thin outfit that had fired its head coach two weeks earlier. There's a reason the Clippers were one of the teams <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/3256715" href="https://thescore.com/news/3256715">under the most pressure</a> entering the playoffs. Because if not now, when? That's the question the Clippers and their fans have to ask themselves after a seven-game loss to the Denver Nuggets marked another early exit for a team that's won just three series since signing Leonard six years ago. For this, they stripped themselves of every shred of prospect capital and relinquished control of all their own first-round picks between now and 2030. That's going to make executing any kind of pivot very challenging. And it takes a measure of blind faith to believe this same team can come back and produce a better result next year.Leonard will turn 34 this summer, and it's hard to imagine he has many kicks at the can left given his injury history. Harden will turn 36 with the ability to become a free agent by declining a $36-million player option. Another rough Game 7 notwithstanding, he produced an awesome season in which he played all but three games and kept the team's offense afloat with Leonard on the shelf for three months. Considering L.A. can ill afford to let another star walk for nothing, odds are he'll be able to negotiate another one-plus-one or two-plus-one type of deal. But at his age, can we expect even one more season like the one he just had?It's a good thing Ivica Zubac and Norman Powell are locked up on team-friendly deals (it'll be interesting to see whether Powell's willing to extend his), because any upward mobility is contingent on those guys continuing to build on their late-career breakthroughs. Even then, L.A. will probably need youngish guys like Amir Coffey (if he re-signs), Jordan Miller, and Kobe Brown to make strides. And startlingly important 36-year-old Nic Batum to return for one last hurrah. But none of that even matters unless Leonard can stay healthy and Harden can sustain an All-Star level.I've been <a data-in-app-uri="thescore:///news/2934216" href="https://thescore.com/news/2934216">wrong about the Clippers</a> before, and this is a creative front office, but it really does feel like they've run out of cards to play. Let's see if they have one more up their sleeve. - Wolfond<h3>Memphis Grizzlies </h3><figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/760330/cropped_GettyImages-2188847815.jpg?ts=1746471407" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/760330/w220xh124_GettyImages-2188847815.jpg?ts=1746471407 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/760330/w320xh180_GettyImages-2188847815.jpg?ts=1746471407 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/760330/w640xh360_GettyImages-2188847815.jpg?ts=1746471407 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/760330/w768xh432_GettyImages-2188847815.jpg?ts=1746471407 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/760330/w1080xh607_GettyImages-2188847815.jpg?ts=1746471407 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> Joe Murphy / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>The Grizzlies are one of the toughest teams to get a read on.On one hand, Memphis is still one of the league's youngest teams, already has some valuable postseason experience, and boasts an enviable trio of Ja Morant, Desmond Bane, and Jaren Jackson Jr., the latter of whom is extension eligible this summer (Morant and Bane are under contract through 2028 and 2029, respectively). The Grizzlies also have an intriguing mix of youngsters that includes Zach Edey, Jaylen Wells, Scotty Pippen Jr., restricted free agent Santi Aldama, Vince Williams Jr., and GG Jackson. It's easy to argue that teams in this position should either ride the wave or make a consolidation trade to boost their immediate title hopes.On the other hand, the Grizzlies feel more like a fading contender than a young team on the rise. Morant has gone from future face of the league to one of the league's most unreliable stars. A reported disconnect over offensive philosophies led general manager Zach Kleiman to fire head coach Taylor Jenkins mere weeks before the playoffs despite Memphis sitting fifth in the tough Western Conference. Is it possible new coach Tuomas Iisalo and some better injury luck create a resurgence that propels the Grizzlies back up the West hierarchy? Sure, but it feels like something has to give.Don't be surprised if the Grizzlies shop Morant - or any member of the team's Big Three - more heavily than they shop the youngsters and picks. - Casciaro

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31201424/related

What's next: Where the West's 1st-round outs go from here

One image always immediately jumps to mind when I think of Gregg Popovich coaching on the San Ant...

One image always immediately jumps to mind when I think of Gregg Popovich coaching on the San Antonio Spurs' sideline. It's of him grinning ear to ear and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYSGp4Jp_9E&amp;t=0">giving Shaquille O'Neal a double thumbs-up</a> after instructing Michael Finley to intentionally foul the then-Suns center 5 seconds into the 2008-09 season.O'Neal griped about the Spurs' Hack-a-Shaq tactic during the teams' first-round playoff meeting the year prior, calling it a "coward move." Popovich responding by taking the piss out of him stands out to me not just because it was one of the funniest things I've seen on an NBA court, but because it was one of those rare instances we saw the playful and jovial side of Pop peek out from behind his shroud of curmudgeounry. He always had an acerbic deadpan wit, but rarely expressed outright goofiness like that.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783730/cropped_Screenshot_2025-05-02_at_3.12.48_PM.jpg?ts=1746216822" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783730/w220xh124_Screenshot_2025-05-02_at_3.12.48_PM.jpg?ts=1746216822 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783730/w320xh180_Screenshot_2025-05-02_at_3.12.48_PM.jpg?ts=1746216822 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783730/w640xh360_Screenshot_2025-05-02_at_3.12.48_PM.jpg?ts=1746216822 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783730/w768xh432_Screenshot_2025-05-02_at_3.12.48_PM.jpg?ts=1746216822 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783730/w1080xh607_Screenshot_2025-05-02_at_3.12.48_PM.jpg?ts=1746216822 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> ESPN</figcaption></figure>That was the duality of Pop, though. He could be dead serious about his job without taking the enterprise as a whole too seriously. He could be hard on players but he also cared deeply about them as people, and knew when to apply a softer touch. He obviously loved to coach, clearly lived and breathed this stuff, but also had enough perspective to recognize the absurdity of living and breathing this stuff.<div class="the-score-article-ad-unit"></div>Those who played for or worked under him tended to talk less about his tactical acumen and feel for in-game adjustments (which he obviously had in spades) than his love of wine and lively team dinners, his famed offseason coaching retreats, his eclectic interests outside basketball, and his sense of what was truly important in life.The 76-year-old announced Friday he's stepping away from the sidelines and transitioning to a role as Spurs president of basketball operations. He'd already been absent for nearly the entire 2024-25 season after suffering a stroke in November. The announcement ends the most successful and most prolific coaching tenure in league history: 29 years with one team, with 1,592 combined regular-season and playoff wins, both NBA records by considerable margins.In this era where the average coaching stint lasts just 2.5 seasons, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anything even approaching that level of longevity or success again. The accolades dried up in recent years as San Antonio underwent a rebuild, but over a span of 22 years under Popovich's stewardship, the Spurs made the playoffs every season, amassed the best winning percentage of any team in North American pro sports, won 50-plus games 19 times (with one of the others being a lottery-shortened season in which they went 37-13), and won five championships.<figure class="article-segment--image"><img src="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783731/cropped_GettyImages-84574828.jpg?ts=1746216951" srcset="https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783731/w220xh124_GettyImages-84574828.jpg?ts=1746216951 220w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783731/w320xh180_GettyImages-84574828.jpg?ts=1746216951 320w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783731/w640xh360_GettyImages-84574828.jpg?ts=1746216951 640w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783731/w768xh432_GettyImages-84574828.jpg?ts=1746216951 768w, https://assets-cms.thescore.com/uploads/image/file/783731/w1080xh607_GettyImages-84574828.jpg?ts=1746216951 1080w"><figcaption class="article-segment--image-caption"> D. Clarke Evans / NBA / Getty</figcaption></figure>At the center of it all was, well, Tim Duncan, but also a coach who had the courage and conviction to zag while the rest of the league zigged. What defined the Spurs stylistically during Popovich's historic tenure wasn't their ability to perfect one particular brand of basketball, but their facility for shapeshifting to best suit their personnel. Between his first championship and his fifth, Popovich's offense evolved from being a walk-it-up affair built around rote Duncan post-ups to a free-flowing, uptempo, improvisational motion system that the rest of the NBA quickly tried to emulate. When I talked to coaches around the league about <a href="https://www.thescore.com/nba/news/2883055/how-modern-offenses-blend-old-school-tactics-with-new-age-skills">how offenses have evolved</a> in recent years, almost all of them cited Pop's Spurs as their inspiration. Popovich was ahead of the curve on concepts like advantage basketball and the value of corner threes, but sometimes he swam against the currents he himself helped set in motion. Like when San Antonio signed LaMarcus Aldridge in 2015 and reverted to an old-school, post-centric, mid-range-heavy style en route to back-to-back 60-plus-win seasons.At their best, his Spurs teams reimagined what was possible through collective selflessness and hivemind-like intuition. Their defense was defined by discipline, communication, and attention to detail: Year after year, they managed to avoid fouling, reduce second-chance opportunities, bust it back in transition, and lock down the paint. During that 22-year playoff streak, they never finished lower than 11th in defensive efficiency and finished top three 17 times.Popovic also saw the big picture when it came to preserving players and getting the most out of an entire group, whether that meant limiting his stars' minutes or bringing one of them off the bench. We'll probably never see a more balanced ensemble win a championship than the 2014 Spurs. That team didn't have a single player crack 30 minutes per game during the regular season, and its leading scorer averaged 16.7 points per game. It's a shame we won't get to see Pop get another chance to coach a contender helmed by yet another transformative big man in Victor Wembanyama. But it's nice to know he'll still be involved with the organization. His legacy will continue to live on for decades not only through the Spurs, but through a <a href="https://x.com/CrumpledJumper/status/1918347492128956731">coaching tree</a> that looks more like a coaching forest at this point.While he'll presumably continue to be active behind the scenes, his presence in the scenes will be sorely missed. He was one of one. Salute to an absolute legend.

https://rich-content.thescore.com/content_cards/31182281/related

We'll never see another coach like Gregg Popovich 

https://rich-content.thescore.com/authors/joe-wolfond/content_cards

Joe Wolfond

Features Writer

https://rich-content.thescore.com/authors/joseph-casciaro/content_cards