Independent study on 'Deflategate' finds Wells Report 'deeply flawed'

by
REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

Just about everyone has weighed in on 'Deflategate' and whether or not New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady should have been suspended four games. Now, a team from the American Enterprise Institute has conducted an independent study to get to the bottom of the issue.

Kevin A. Hassett and Stan A. Veuger released their findings in a piece for The New York Times on Friday.

Our study, written with our colleague Joseph Sullivan, examines the evidence and methodology of the Wells report and concludes that it is deeply flawed. We found that the Patriots balls declined by about the expected amount, while the Colts balls declined by less. In fact, the pressure of the Colts balls was statistically significantly higher than expected. Contrary to the report, the significant difference between the changes in pressure of the two teams' balls was not because the pressure of the Patriots balls was too low, but because that of the Colts balls was too high.

The group feels the reason for this had to do with when the pressure of the footballs was measured.

How could this be? The report's own findings suggest an explanation: At halftime, NFL officials measured the pressure of "only a sample" of the Colts balls (four out of 12) before they ran out of time; the second half of the game was about to begin. This implies that the Colts balls sat in the warm room where they were to be measured - and thus increased in pressure - for almost the entirety of halftime before being measured. All of the 11 available Patriots balls, by contrast, were measured at halftime, which suggests that they were measured earlier, when they were colder -- and thus lower in pressure. Although this explanation contradicts the Wells report's conclusions, it fits all the evidence.

AEI also did an independent study on "Bountygate" in 2012 and presented their information at an NFL hearing, before suspensions to the players were lifted.

Whether or not this report has an impact during Brady's appeal hearing later this month is anyone's guess, but the NFLPA will likely be bringing it to the attention of Roger Goodell as evidence.

The Digest

Everything you need to know about the Wells Report

by theScore Staff

On May 6, Ted Wells released the findings from his investigation of the New England Patriots' alleged underinflating of footballs in their AFC Championship win over the Indianapolis Colts. Wells determined that it was "more probable than not" that Patriots personnel both participated in violations of league rules and were involved in a deliberate attempt to circumvent those rules.

Need to Know

  • As a result of the report, the NFL suspended Brady for the first four games of the 2015 season and fined the Patriots $1 million. New England will also have to forfeit its first-round pick in the 2016 draft as well as a fourth-round pick in the 2017 draft.

Related: Everything you need to know about Brady's suspension

  • Ted Wells, author of the Wells Report, defended his findings following the backlash after the Patriots' punishment was revealed. Wells shot back at detractors, saying "I think it’s wrong to question my independence because you don’t like my findings."
  • Once the report was released, newspapers were quick to poke fun at the findings, depicting everything from Brady as Pinocchio to Brady being physically deflated on their front pages.
  • Brady's agent Don Yee issued a scathing statement of the report questioning Wells' integrity and suggested investigators determined Brady's guilt before seeking facts and then built the report around that framework.
  • Even president Barack Obama took a jab at the Super Bowl champions when they visited the White House. "I usually tell a lot of jokes at these things, but with the Pats in town, I was afraid that 11 out of 12 of them would fall flat," Obama said.

Further Reading/Viewing

  • Juliet Macur of The New York Times believes the incident will forever tarnish Brady's legacy as one of the game's best players. [The New York Times]
  • Ian Crouch of The New Yorker examines the hit Brady's image will take not only from the revelation he likely cheated but the lies he likely told in the wake of his violations. [The New Yorker]
  • Ian O'Connor of ESPN.com dives deeper into what this mess means for Brady's credibility moving forward. [ESPN]
  • Dan Shaughnessy of The Boston Globe encourages the Patriots to come clean and start rebuilding trust, lest they tarnish their legacy irreparably. [The Boston Globe]
  • Peter King of The MMQB says if NFL commissioner Roger Goodell decides to penalize Brady with a suspension or heavy fine, it will forever alter Brady's perception among peers and fans. [MMQB]

Top Tweets

Advertisement