Patriots owner Robert Kraft stands by Tom Brady, calls Wells Report 'very disturbing'

by
David Butler II-USA TODAY Sports / Reuters

Speaking publicly for the first time since his team was disciplined by the NFL, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft remains convinced Tom Brady played no part in the alleged deflating of footballs prior to the AFC Championship game.

"... We had the discussion - if you did it, let's just deal with it and take our hit and move on," Kraft told Peter King of The MMQB on Saturday. "I've known Tommy 16 years, almost half his life. He's a man, and he's always been honest with me, and I trust him. I believed what he told me. He has never lied to me, and I have found no hard or conclusive evidence to the contrary."

Kraft is also convinced that there is no smoking gun tying anyone within the Patriots' organization to the deflated footballs, and believes the Wells Report distorted science to fit an incorrect conclusion.

"This whole thing has been very disturbing," Kraft said. "I'm still thinking things out very carefully. But when you work for something your whole life …

"I just get really worked up. To receive the harshest penalty in league history is just not fair. The anger and frustration with this process, to me, it wasn't fair. If we're giving all the power to the NFL and the office of the commissioner, this is something that can happen to all 32 teams. We need to have fair and balanced investigating and reporting. But in this report, every inference went against us … inferences from ambiguous, circumstantial evidence all went against us. That's the thing that really bothers me."

The Patriots were fined $1 million - the largest franchise fine in the history of the NFL - and lost a pair of draft picks, including a first-rounder in 2016. The league also suspended Brady for the first four games of the 2015 season, which he's appealed through the NFLPA.

King says Kraft was elusive at times during their 50-minute phone conversation. Asked whether he intends to go to court in an attempt to have the penalties overturned, Kraft replied, "I'm not going to comment on that at this point in time. I'm going to leave it. I won't say."

Kraft also refused to say why he suspended John Jastremski and Jim McNally, the two team employees at the center of the Wells Report, despite vehemently proclaiming his organization's innocence.

As for why he accepted league-imposed sanctions for illegal videotaping in 2007 but not these penalties, Kraft said it comes down to facts.

"Last time, there was no dispute about the facts. The team admittedly said what happened … It was illegal to videotape (the opposing sidelines), and in the end we admitted it and took our penance," he said.

"This is very different. In 2007, we did something and acknowledged the fact of what was done. This is an accusation of wrongdoing, without proof."

The Digest

Everything you need to know about Tom Brady's suspension

by theScore Staff

On May 11, the NFL suspended New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady for the first four games of the 2015 season for his role in the "Deflategate" scandal involving underinflated footballs discovered during January's AFC Championship game against the Indianapolis Colts.

Need to know

  • The NFLPA filed an appeal of Brady's four-game suspension on his behalf on May 14, criticizing the NFL's "history of inconsistency and arbitrary decisions in disciplinary matters, " and requesting the appeal be heard by a neutral arbitrator.
  • The NFL announced on May 14 that Goodell will preside over Brady's appeal, the commissioner invoking his right to do so as stipulated in the CBA. "My mind is open," Goodell said in a statement on June 2 when he officially informed the NFLPA of his decision to hear the appeal.
  • Along with Brady's suspension, the Patriots were fined $1 million and must forfeit their first-round draft pick in 2016 and fourth-round draft pick in 2017.
  • Goodell spoke to the media on May 20, saying Kraft's decision to accept the NFL's penalties will have no impact on Brady's appeal. "I look forward to hearing from Tom," Goodell said. "If there's new information ... I want to hear directly from Tom on that."
  • The punishment for Brady and the Patriots came five days after the release of the Wells Report. The report declared it was "more probable than not" that Patriots personnel violated league rules by lowering the air pressure in game balls and that Brady was aware of the activities.
  • Ted Wells, author of the Wells Report, defended his findings following the backlash after the Patriots' punishment was revealed. Wells shot back at detractors, saying "I think it’s wrong to question my independence because you don’t like my findings."
  • The Brady suspension has already impacted the gambling world. The Patriots dropped from a six-point favorite in Week 1 against the Pittsburgh Steelers to a one-point favorite, while their odds of winning the AFC East also took a hit.
  • If Brady's four-game suspension is upheld on appeal, his first game back would come Week 6 against - oddly enough - the Colts.

Further Reading

  • theScore's own Arun Srinivasan examines the need for the league to come down hard on both Brady and the Patriots. While the punishment may have been overly harsh, it proves no one, even a four-time champ, is above the rules in the NFL.
  • Following a series of PR nightmares in relation to punishment doled out by the NFL (Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson), USA Today's Chris Chase argues the league finally got it right with Brady and the Patriots. [USA Today - For The Win]
  • On the other hand, Yahoo Sports' Frank Schwab makes the case that the NFL royally screwed up, presenting five reasons - including the lack of evidence against Brady - the decision was "dead wrong." [Yahoo Sports]
  • The MMQB's Peter King points out that the league wanted to show it doesn't play favorites by severely penalizing the Patriots. He also considers the impact of the situation on Brady's legacy. [The MMQB]
  • Sports Illustrated's Greg A. Bedard makes the case for Patriots' owner Robert Kraft leading the charge to replace Roger Goodell as commissioner. “I really don’t see how Robert is going to get past this with Roger,” a Patriots source told Bedard. [Sports Illustrated]

Top Tweets

Advertisement