Tom Brady's 4-game suspension is jarring, but action needs to be taken

by Arun Srinivasan
Stew Milne-USA TODAY Sports / Reuters

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady was issued a four-game suspension for his role in the "Deflategate" scandal on Monday. The Patriots were also issued a league-record $1-million fine, and will surrender their 2016 first-round and 2017 fourth-round picks.

While the sanction is admittedly harsh and unprecedented, there needed to be significant action taken against Brady and the Patriots for their second brazen circumvention of league rules in eight years.

Brady's suspension is the first of its kind and many are already debating whether it's a fair punishment. It's a jarring decision by the league to suspend Brady for a quarter of the season with his involvement in the case largely circumstantial.

Considering the NFL originally handed Ray Rice a two-game suspension for assaulting his then-fiancee, and the league purportedly took a stand against domestic violence, Brady's suspension is a shining example of the seemingly arbitrary sanction system during Roger Goodell's reign. The NFL established mandatory suspensions for substance abuse, but were clearly overwhelmed by the evidence presented in the Wells Report without a prior case establishing a set of base rules.

Some are decrying Brady's punishment because he's the league's most marketable star and his absence will have a real impact on television ratings and the multi-billion dollar fantasy football industry. That sentiment was refuted by Troy Vincent, the NFL's vice president of football operations, noting that all players abide by the same rules "no matter how accomplished and otherwise respected."

It may be an incomprehensible suspension because Brady looms larger than life in a league full of American luminaries, but the four-time champion isn't immune to league regulations. Patriots fans can take solace in the fact that Brady can and will likely win an appeal to get his suspension reduced, potentially to two games. It doesn't explain why Brady gratuitously sought a competitive advantage that his juggernaut Patriots didn't need, and refused to cooperate with the subsequent investigation.

No one can deny head coach Bill Belichick is a genius of sorts, and the Patriots in his image are presented as a cunning, calculated machine that finds and cultivates talent where 31 teams didn't bother to look. Much like in the 2007 "Spygate" scandal, Belichick, Brady, and Patriots owner Robert Kraft carried themselves as the smartest people in the league, and were caught for a clear violation of league rules.

Brady's initial punishment of four games, along with the Patriots' forfeiture of two draft picks, appears on first glance to be a ruthless suspension handed out by a disengaged despot. However, a clear message needed to be sent to the Patriots for another blatant attempt to circumvent league rules, one that will reverberate throughout Boston for the summer.

The Digest

Everything you need to know about Tom Brady's suspension

by theScore Staff

On May 11, the NFL suspended New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady for the first four games of the 2015 season for his role in the "Deflategate" scandal involving underinflated footballs discovered during January's AFC Championship game against the Indianapolis Colts.

Need to know

  • The NFLPA filed an appeal of Brady's four-game suspension on his behalf on May 14, criticizing the NFL's "history of inconsistency and arbitrary decisions in disciplinary matters, " and requesting the appeal be heard by a neutral arbitrator.
  • The NFL announced on May 14 that Goodell will preside over Brady's appeal, the commissioner invoking his right to do so as stipulated in the CBA. "My mind is open," Goodell said in a statement on June 2 when he officially informed the NFLPA of his decision to hear the appeal.
  • Along with Brady's suspension, the Patriots were fined $1 million and must forfeit their first-round draft pick in 2016 and fourth-round draft pick in 2017.
  • Goodell spoke to the media on May 20, saying Kraft's decision to accept the NFL's penalties will have no impact on Brady's appeal. "I look forward to hearing from Tom," Goodell said. "If there's new information ... I want to hear directly from Tom on that."
  • The punishment for Brady and the Patriots came five days after the release of the Wells Report. The report declared it was "more probable than not" that Patriots personnel violated league rules by lowering the air pressure in game balls and that Brady was aware of the activities.
  • Ted Wells, author of the Wells Report, defended his findings following the backlash after the Patriots' punishment was revealed. Wells shot back at detractors, saying "I think it’s wrong to question my independence because you don’t like my findings."
  • The Brady suspension has already impacted the gambling world. The Patriots dropped from a six-point favorite in Week 1 against the Pittsburgh Steelers to a one-point favorite, while their odds of winning the AFC East also took a hit.
  • If Brady's four-game suspension is upheld on appeal, his first game back would come Week 6 against - oddly enough - the Colts.

Further Reading

  • theScore's own Arun Srinivasan examines the need for the league to come down hard on both Brady and the Patriots. While the punishment may have been overly harsh, it proves no one, even a four-time champ, is above the rules in the NFL.
  • Following a series of PR nightmares in relation to punishment doled out by the NFL (Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson), USA Today's Chris Chase argues the league finally got it right with Brady and the Patriots. [USA Today - For The Win]
  • On the other hand, Yahoo Sports' Frank Schwab makes the case that the NFL royally screwed up, presenting five reasons - including the lack of evidence against Brady - the decision was "dead wrong." [Yahoo Sports]
  • The MMQB's Peter King points out that the league wanted to show it doesn't play favorites by severely penalizing the Patriots. He also considers the impact of the situation on Brady's legacy. [The MMQB]
  • Sports Illustrated's Greg A. Bedard makes the case for Patriots' owner Robert Kraft leading the charge to replace Roger Goodell as commissioner. “I really don’t see how Robert is going to get past this with Roger,” a Patriots source told Bedard. [Sports Illustrated]

Top Tweets

Advertisement