It's time for the NBA to outlaw fouling while up 3

The NBA's conference finals have produced some fantastic high-stakes basketball, perhaps none more so than Game 4 of the West final between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Minnesota Timberwolves. That was until the final minute, when a thrilling affair devolved into a free-throw shooting contest.

The trailing Timberwolves hacked Thunder players in an attempt to extend the game at the charity stripe, while OKC is among the many teams that intentionally foul opponents when leading by three points in the dying seconds. That strategy burned the Thunder in a Game 1 loss to Denver a couple of weeks ago - mostly because they deployed the gambit too early - but it's mathematically sound. The trailing team is less likely to make enough free throws to tie or win than it is to make a 3-pointer.

The final 35 seconds of Game 4 featured seven intentional fouls and 10 free throws. OKC committed three of those fouls, including one on Timberwolves star Anthony Edwards with 3.1 seconds remaining that prevented Minnesota from attempting a potential game-tying three. Instead, the take foul put Edwards on the free-throw line for two shots (the second of which he had to intentionally miss to keep the Wolves alive).

For years, I sat idly by while others bemoaned this late-game tactic. It didn't make for great TV, but I didn't like the idea of policing good strategy either. We've seen NFL teams allow opponents to score just to get the ball back late in games. We've watched soccer stars show off their core strength and ball-shielding skills by keeping the ball in the corners to kill time. Such gamesmanship exists in every sport on some level. If an NBA team earned a lead through 47-plus minutes, who was I to tell them how to protect it just for my entertainment?

However, watching a classic playoff game lose all of its steam was the final nudge I needed to join the chorus calling for an end to this scourge. The NBA should institute a new rule where an intentional foul by the leading team in the final 24 seconds results in free throws and possession. That will put an end to the practice.

Some will contend that such a rule rewards losers, since the trailing team is still free to hack away. The difference is that fouling while behind already carries risk, potentially allowing the leading team to pull further ahead by making its free throws.

Plus, eliminating intentional fouls from both sides would do more harm than good, as it would rob us of the type of late-game comebacks this year's Indiana Pacers are now famous for. It can be exciting when trailing teams have to sell out on their ball pressure and defensive traps in an effort to turn their opponent over rather than relying on fouls, but there would also be plenty of occasions when the leading team could simply run out the clock knowing that a foul isn't coming.

If the only way to push through anti-take-foul legislation is policing it on both sides, that's a concession I'd be willing to make. It would also aid the league in its quest for two-hour games. But the best compromise for pace of play and entertainment would be to disincentivize teams leading by three from doing it.

The NBA has made TV-friendly business decisions before, like when the league penalized away-from-the-ball fouls in the last 2 minutes and transition take fouls (at any time). Eliminating the fouls that rob us of potential game-tying 3-point attempts needs to be the next change - just in time to guarantee the league's $76-billion media partners a purer product.

Make teams play basketball until the end. Give your stars a chance to make more plays with the game on the line, not just from the line.

Joseph Casciaro is theScore's lead Raptors and NBA reporter.